Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13049 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2021
T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 02.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax,
No.63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore. ... Appellant
v.
M/s. BRT Spinners Pvt. Ltd.,
No.336, Pullakkadu Thottam,
Kombakkadupudur, Itchipatti Post,
Coimbatore – 641 668.
PAN: AAA CB 7320 D ... Respondent/Cross Objector
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
"A" Bench, dated 10.09.2014 in C.O.No.61/Mds/2014 in
ITA.No.1675/Mds/2014 for the Assessment Year 2010-2011.
Page 1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
For Appellant : Mr. T.R.Senthil Kumar
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.S. Sendamarai Kannan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.S.Sendamarai Kannan,
learned counsel for the respondent.
2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 10.09.2014 made in C.O.No.61/Mds/2014 in
ITA.No.1675/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Chennai, "A" Bench (for brevity, the Tribunal) for the
Assessment Year 2010-2011.
3. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question
of law:-
Page 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the proceeds realized by the assessee on sale of Certified Emission Reduction Credit, which the assessee had earned on the Clean Development mechanism in its wind energy operations, is a capital receipt and not taxable?”
4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the
appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on
account of the Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated
08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said
Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the
High Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that
the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.
5. In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect
in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty
Page 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the
appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [R.H., J.]
Index : Yes/No 02.07.2021
Internet : Yes
gv
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai,"A" Bench
Page 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and R.HEMALATHA,J
gv
T.C.A.No.353 of 2015
02.07.2021
Page 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!