Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prakasam vs Shanmugam
2021 Latest Caselaw 695 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 695 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021

Madras High Court
Prakasam vs Shanmugam on 8 January, 2021
                                                                         C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 08.01.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                              C.M.A.No.3239 of 2019

                   Prakasam                                                   .. Appellant


                                                       Vs.


                   1.Shanmugam

                   2.Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                     No.138/2, II Floor, LMR Shopping Arcade,
                     Opp. MGM Theatre, Salem Main Road,
                     Namakkal.                                               .. Respondents

                   Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor

                   Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2019, made

                   in M.C.O.P. No.519 of 2014, on the file of the Sub Court, (Motor Accident

                   Claims Tribunal) Tiruchengode.




                   ___
                   1/9



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

                                         For Appellant      : Mr.T.S.Arthanareeswaran
                                                              for M/s. C.Paraneedharan

                                         For Respondents : No appearance (For R1)

                                                              Mrs.K.Saraswathi (For R2)
                                                             for Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy

                                                  JUDGMENT

The matter is heard through "Video Conferencing".

This appeal has been filed for enhancement of compensation granted

by the award dated 28.03.2019, made in M.C.O.P. No.519 of 2014, on the file

of the Sub Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) Tiruchengode.

2.The appellant-claimant filed M.C.O.P. No.519 of 2014, on the file of

the Sub Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) Tiruchengode, claiming a

sum of Rs.15,00,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him in

the accident that took place on 30.12.2013.

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

3.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence, held that the accident occurred only due to rash and negligent

riding by the 1st respondent, rider-cum-owner of the Motorcycle and directed

the 2nd respondent, as insurer of the offending vehicle, to pay a sum of

Rs.1,24,253/- as compensation to the appellant at the first instance and

recover the same from the 1st respondent.

4.Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal in the

award dated 28.03.2019, made in M.C.O.P. No.519 of 2014, the appellant has

come out with the present appeal.

5.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that in the

accident, the appellant suffered head injury and fracture at left clavicle. He

has taken treatment as in-patient at Krishna Hospital, Tiruchengode, from

31.12.2013 to 22.01.2014, for a period of 23 days. He underwent surgeries

and plates and screws were fixed. The Medical Board examined the appellant

and certified that the appellant suffered 5% disability. The Tribunal has

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

awarded a meagre sum of Rs.15,000/- towards disability at the rate of

Rs.3,000/- per percentage, instead of adopting multiplier method. The

Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation towards loss of earning

capacity. At the time of accident, the appellant was working as a Mason and

was earning a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month. The Tribunal failed to award

any amount towards loss of income during treatment period, attendant

charges, loss of amenities and transportation to the Hospital. The amounts

awarded by the Tribunal under other heads are meagre and prayed for

enhancement of the compensation.

6.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent-

Insurance Company contended that the Tribunal considering the nature of

injuries and report of Medical Board marked as Ex.P7, in the absence of any

evidence to prove that the appellant suffered functional disability, rightly

adopted percentage method and granted compensation towards disability, which

is in order. The total compensation awarded by the Tribunal is not meagre. The

appellant has not made out any case for enhancement of the compensation and

prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

7.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the 2nd

respondent-Insurance Company and perused the materials available on record.

8.From the materials on record, it is seen that it is the contention of the

appellant that in the accident he suffered head injuries and fracture. The Medical

Board, examined the appellant and certified that the appellant suffered 5%

disability. To prove the same, the appellant has marked the disability certificate

as Ex.P7. The appellant has not filed any material to show that he suffered

functional disability. In the absence of any material evidence to show that the

appellant suffered functional disability and lost his earning capacity, the

appellant is not entitled to compensation towards loss of earning, by adopting

multiplier method. In view of the above materials, the award of the Tribunal

granting compensation by adopting percentage method is proper and valid and

he is not entitled to any enhancement towards disability and loss of earning

power. For the injuries sustained in the accident, the appellant has taken

treatment as in-patient at Krishna Hospital, Tiruchengode, from 31.12.2013 to

22.01.2014, for a period of 23 days. The Tribunal failed to award any amount

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

towards attendant charges, loss of amenities and transportation to Hospital.

Considering the nature of injuries and period of treatment taken, a sum of

Rs.20,000/-, Rs.25,000/- and Rs.10,000/- are granted towards loss of

amenities, attendant charges and transportation to Hospital respectively. The

Tribunal has awarded a meagre sum of Rs.10,000/- towards extra

nourishment. Considering the nature of injuries suffered by the appellant, the

same is enhanced to Rs.25,000/-. The Tribunal failed to award any amount

towards damages to clothes. Hence, a sum of Rs.2,000/- is granted towards

damages to clothes.

9.It is the contention of the appellant that at the time of accident, he was

working as a Mason and was earning a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month. He failed

to prove the same. The accident is of the year 2013. In the absence of any

material evidence to prove the avocation and income, a sum of Rs.10,000/- per

month is fixed as the notional income. Due to the injuries suffered in the

accident, the appellant would not have worked atleast for a period of two

months. Hence, a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.10,000/- x 2 months) is granted

towards loss of income, at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per month for two months. The

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

amounts awarded by the Tribunal under other heads are just and reasonable and

hence, the same are hereby confirmed. Thus, the compensation awarded by the

Tribunal is modified as follows:

S. No Description Amount awarded Amount Award by Tribunal awarded by this confirmed or (Rs) Court (Rs) enhanced or granted

1. Permanent Disability 15,000/- 15,000/- Confirmed

2. Medical expenses 84,253/- 84,253/- Confirmed

3. Pain and sufferings and 15,000/- 15,000/- Confirmed mental agony

4. Extra nourishment 10,000/- 25,000/- Enhanced

5. Attendant charges - 25,000/- Granted

6. Loss of amenities - 20,000/- Granted

7. Loss of income - 20,000/- Granted

8. Transportation - 10,000/- Granted

9. Damage to clothes - 2,000/- Granted Total 1,24,253/- 2,16,253/- Enhanced by Rs.92,000/-

10.In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the amount awarded

by the Tribunal at Rs.1,24,253/- is enhanced to Rs.2,16,253/- together with

interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of

deposit. The 2nd respondent-Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

award amount, now determined by this Court, along with interest and costs,

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment, to the credit of M.C.O.P. No.519 of 2014, at the first instance and

recover the same from the 1st respondent. On such deposit, the appellant is

permitted to withdraw the award amount, now determined by this Court,

along with interest and costs, after adjusting the amount, if any already

withdrawn, by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal. No costs.

08.01.2021 gsa

To

1.The Subordinate Judge, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Tiruchengode.

2.The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras.

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.3239 of 2019

V.M.VELUMANI, J.,

gsa

C.M.A.No.3239 of 2019

08.01.2021

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter