Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gopalsamy vs N.Raji
2021 Latest Caselaw 507 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 507 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Madras High Court
Gopalsamy vs N.Raji on 7 January, 2021
                                                       1

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED : 07.01.2021

                                                   CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

                                         C.M.A(MD)No.1108 of 2011


                Gopalsamy                                    ...Appellant/Petitioner

                                                     Vs.
                1.N.Raji

                3.The Branch Manager,
                  New India Assurance Company Ltd.,
                  77, Police Station Road,
                  Sivakasi – 626 123.               ... Respondents/ Respondents


                PRAYER:Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor
                Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the award dated 05.01.2009 passed in
                M.C.O.P.NO.44 of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal
                (Subordinate Court), Sivakasi, insofar as relating to the quantum and dismissal
                as against the second respondent are concerned, by allowing this Civil
                Miscellaneous Appeal.
                                  For Appellants     : Mrs.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya

                                  For Respondent     : Mr.M.Asok Kumar
                                       No.1
                                  For Respondent     : Mr.J.S.Murali
                                       No.2                 Standing Counsel



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                         2

                                                   JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed as against the judgment and

award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Sivakasi in

MCOP.No.44 of 2004, dated 05.01.2009.

2.The appellant is the claimant. He filed the claim petition seeking

compensation of Rs.3,00,000/-. According to him, on 04.01.2004, he was riding

his bicycle on Thiruthangal – Virudhunagar main road, towards North. When he

was nearing a limestone kiln, a motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN 67

R 2238, which was coming in the same direction in a rash and negligent

manner, hit against the bicycle form behind. In the impact, he was thrown away

from the bicycle and he sustained fracture and injuries. He was immediately

taken to Dr.Mookaiya for providing first aid and thereafter he was admitted in

PAMC Hospital at Madurai. Since the accident had occurred due to the

negligence of the rider of the motor cycle, the owner as well as the insurer are

liable to pay compensation.

3.The 2nd respondent insurance company resisted the claim petition,

disputing the manner of the accident, as stated by the claimant and also

submitted that the charge sheet was filed against one Arokiaraj and he also

pleaded guilty before the Criminal Court. The change of driver was done http://www.judis.nic.in

deliberately to make a false claim against the insurance company. So it is a

fraudulent arrangement made between the owner and the said Arokiaraj and the

claim is also excessive.

4.Before the Tribunal, the claimant examined two witnesses and marked

seven documents. On the side of the insurance company three witnesses were

examined and four documents were marked. On appreciation of evidence, the

tribunal came to the conclusion that the rider of the motorcycle caused the

accident and awarded a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- [Rupees One Lakh],

directing the claimant to get the amount from the owner of the vehicle. The

liability of the insurance company was exonerated. Challenging the said

findings of the Tribunal, the present appeal has been filed.

5.Heard Mrs.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya, learned Counsel appearing for the

appellant and Mr.M.Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the 1st

respondent and Mr.J.S.Murali, learned Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent

and perused the materials available on record.

6.In the instant case, the appellant approached the Tribunal claiming

compensation on the ground that the rider of the motorcycle, bearing

Registration No.TN 67 R 2238 came in a rash and negligent manner and hit http://www.judis.nic.in

against his bicycle. In the claim petition itself, it is specifically stated that the

vehicle was driven by the 1st respondent namely, N.Raji.

7.It is seen that though a criminal case was registered against the 1st

respondent, the final report was filed against one Arockiaraj. He also pleaded

guilty and paid the fine amount before the Criminal Court. Though there is a

discrepancy with regard to the rider of the motorcycle, the Tribunal has

categorically found that the bicycle was hit by the rider of the motorcycle and

the rider of the motorcycle alone is responsible for the accident.

8.While deciding the liability, the Tribunal found that despite notice

issued by the insurance company under Ex.R2, the owner has not responded.

RW.1 the Assistant from the RTO office deposed that the 1st respondent herein

was not issued with any licence. It is seen that notwithstanding all positive

steps taken by the Insurance Company, no evidence was forthcoming from the

owner with regard to filing of criminal case against him and possession of valid

licence. Therefore, in my considered opinion that the insurer has discharged his

burden of proof and it is held that the vehicle was driven by a person, who has

no valid and effective driving licence.

http://www.judis.nic.in

9.It is also not disputed that the claimant is a third party and even if there

is any violation of the policy conditions, the insurance company is liable to

satisfy the award of the Tribunal and then recover from the owner of the

vehicle.

10.In the light of the above fact, while confirming the award of the

Tribunal, this Court directs the 2nd respondent insurance company, first to pay

the award amount and thereafter, recover it from the owner of the vehicle, by

adopting the mode suggested by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of

Nanjappan Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Others, reported in

2003(1)L.W. 77.

11.With the above modification, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly

allowed. No costs. The 2nd respondent/ insurance company is directed to

deposit the entire award amount with accrued interests at the rate of 7.5% per

annum and within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment, if not already deposited and on such deposit being made, the

claimant is permitted to withdraw the award amount.

                Index           : Yes/No                                              07.01.2021
                Internet        : Yes/No
                dsk
http://www.judis.nic.in


                To

                1.The Judge,

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Court), Sivakasi.

2.The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Ltd., 77, Police Station Road, Sivakasi – 626 123.

http://www.judis.nic.in

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

dsk

C.M.A(MD)No.1108 of 2011

07.01.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter