Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nagarajan vs Bala & Balamurugan
2021 Latest Caselaw 498 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 498 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Madras High Court
Nagarajan vs Bala & Balamurugan on 7 January, 2021
                                                                          C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 07.01.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                              C.M.A.No.1987 of 2020

                   Nagarajan                                                   .. Appellant
                                                        Vs.

                   1.Bala & Balamurugan
                   (R1 remained exparte before the Tribunal)

                   2.Gunasekaran

                   3.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,
                     Karaikal, Rep. By its Branch Manager,
                     Having Office at 1st Floor,
                     MAJ Appartments, No.149, Bharathiar Road,
                     Karaikal town and District Munsifi.                      .. Respondents


                   Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor

                   Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 23.03.2020, made

                   in M.C.O.P. No.84 of 2014, on the file of the District Judge, (Motor Accident

                   Claims Tribunal) Karaikal.


                   ___
                   1/9



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020


                                         For Appellant      : Mr.K.Varadhakamaraj

                                         For Respondents : Mr.J. Chandran (For R3)

                                                   JUDGMENT

The matter is heard through "Video Conferencing".

This appeal has been filed for enhancement of compensation granted

by the award dated 23.03.2020, made in M.C.O.P. No.84 of 2014, on the file

of the District Judge, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) Karaikal.

2.By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well

as the 3rd respondent, the appeal is taken up for final disposal at the admission

stage itself.

3.The appellant-claimant filed M.C.O.P. No.84 of 2014, on the file of

the District Judge, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) Karaikal, claiming a

sum of Rs.50,00,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him in

the accident that took place on 18.03.2014.

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

4.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent riding by

1st respondent, rider of the Motorcycle belonging to the 2nd respondent and

directed the 3rd respondent, as insurer of the offending vehicle, to pay a sum

of Rs.1,63,750/- as compensation to the appellant.

5.Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal in the

award dated 23.03.2020, made in M.C.O.P. No.84 of 2014, the appellant has

come out with the present appeal.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that in the

accident, the appellant suffered grievous injuries all over the body and

underwent surgeries and suffered disability. The Medical Board has assessed

that the appellant suffered 9% disability and issued disability certificate,

marked as Ex.C1. At the time of accident, the appellant was working as

Electrician cum A/c Mechanic. The Tribunal ought to have fixed a sum of

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

Rs.500/- per day as notional income and determined loss of income. The

Tribunal failed to award any enhancement towards future prospects, loss of

earning power, loss of amenities and future medical expenses. The amounts

awarded by the Tribunal towards attendant charges, transportation, extra

nourishment and pain and suffering are meagre and prayed for enhancement

of the compensation.

7.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent-

Insurance Company contended that the Tribunal considering the nature of

injuries and disability certificate issued by Medical Board, accepted 9%

disability assessed by the Medical Board and awarded compensation towards

disability at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per percentage for 9% disability. The

appellant failed to prove his avocation and income. Hence, the Tribunal rightly

did not award any amount towards loss of income. The compensation awarded

by the Tribunal under different heads are not meagre. The appellant has not

made out any case for enhancement of the compensation and prayed for

dismissal of the appeal.

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

8.Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the 3rd

respondent-Insurance Company and perused the materials available on record.

9.From the materials on record, it is seen that it is the contention of the

appellant that in the accident he suffered multiple and grievous injuries all over

the body. The Medical Board has examined the appellant and certified that the

appellant suffered 9% disability. To prove the same, the appellant has marked

discharge summary and disability certificate as Exs.P10 and C1 respectively.

The Tribunal accepted the percentage of disability assessed by the Medical

Board and awarded a sum of Rs.27,000/- towards disability at the rate of

Rs.3,000/- per percentage for 9% disability. The accident is of the year 2014.

The amount granted by the Tribunal is meagre. The appellant is entitled to a sum

of Rs.4,000/- per percentage for 9% disability. Hence, the amount awarded by

the Tribunal towards disability is enhanced to Rs.36,000/- [Rs.4,000/- x 9%],

at the rate of Rs.4,000/- per percentage for 9% disability. For the injuries

sustained in the accident, the appellant has taken treatment as in-patient in

Vinodhan memorial Hospital, Thanjavur from 19.03.2014 to 02.04.2014 and

underwent surgery for fixation of Maxila. Thereafter, he continued his

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

treatment upto 08.08.2016. The amounts awarded by the Tribunal towards

attendant charges, extra nourishment and transportation to hospital are

meagre. Considering the nature of injuries and period of treatment taken, a

sum of Rs.15,000/- each is awarded towards attendant charges and extra

nourishment and Rs.10,000/- towards transportation to Hospital. The Tribunal

failed to award any amount towards loss of amenities. Considering the nature

of injuries, a sum of Rs.15,000/- is awarded towards loss of amenities.

10.It is the contention of the appellant that at the time of accident, he

was working as a Electrician cum A/c. Mechanic and was earning a sum of

Rs.500/- per day as salary and Rs.200/- per day as batta. He failed to prove the

same. The accident is of the year 2014. Considering the year of accident and

nature of work done by the appellant, a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month is fixed as

notional income of the appellant. Due to the accident, the appellant would not

have worked atleast for a period of three months. Thus, a sum of Rs.30,000/-

[Rs.10,000/- x 3 months], is awarded towards loss of income for three

months. The amount awarded by the Tribunal under other heads are just and

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

reasonable and hence, the same are hereby confirmed. Thus, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal is modified as follows:

S. No Description Amount awarded Amount Award by Tribunal awarded by this confirmed or (Rs) Court (Rs) enhanced or granted

1. Partial permanent 27,000/- 36,000/- Enhanced disability

2. Pain and suffering 25,000/- 25,000/- Confirmed

3. Loss of convenience 5,000/- 5,000/- Confirmed

4. Medical bills 89,500/- 89,500/- Confirmed

5. Attendant charges 2,250/- 15,000/- Enhanced

6. Extra nourishment 10,000/- 15,000/- Enhanced

7. Transportation 5,000/- 10,000/- Enhanced

8. Loss of amenities - 15,000/- Granted

9. Loss of income - 30,000/- Granted Total 1,63,750/- 2,40,500/- Enhanced by Rs.76,750/-

11.In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the amount awarded

by the Tribunal at Rs.1,63,750/- is enhanced to Rs.2,40,500/- together with

interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of

deposit. The 3rd respondent-Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

award amount, now determined by this Court, along with interest and costs,

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

judgment, to the credit of M.C.O.P. No.84 of 2014. On such deposit, the

appellant is permitted to withdraw the award amount, now determined by this

Court, along with interest and costs, after adjusting the amount, if any already

withdrawn, by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal. The

appellant is directed to pay the necessary court fee on the enhanced award

amount. No costs.

07.01.2021 gsa

To

1.The District Judge, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Karaikal.

2.The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras.

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.1987 of 2020

V.M.VELUMANI, J.,

gsa

C.M.A.No.1987 of 2020

07.01.2021

___

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter