Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Arun vs State Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 480 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 480 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Madras High Court
D.Arun vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 7 January, 2021
                                                              1           W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED: 07.01.2021

                                                  CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                       W.P.(MD)No.17835 of 2020
                                                  and
                                       W.M.P.(MD)No.14870 of 2020


                      D.Arun                                                ... Petitioner
                                                     Vs.
                      1. State of Tamil Nadu,
                         Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government,
                         Department of Health and Family Welfare,
                         Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.

                      2. State of Tamil Nadu,
                         Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government,
                         Department of School Education,
                         Fort St. George, Chennai -9.

                      3. The Director of Medical Education,
                         O/o. The Directorate of Medical Education,
                         162, Periyar E.V.R. High Road,
                         Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

                      4. The Selection Committee,
                         Rep.by the Secretary/Additional Director,
                         Directorate of Medical Education,
                         162, Periyar E.V.R. High Road,
                         Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

                      5. The Director of School Education,
                         O/o. The Director of School Education,
                         DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 6.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                      1/12
                                                                         2         W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020


                      6.The Chief Educational Officer,
                        O/o. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

                      7.The District Collector cum Chairman,
                        Chattram Administration,
                        Collectorate, Thanjavur District.

                      8.The Special Tahsildar,
                        Chattram Administration,
                        Thanjavur District.

                      9.The Headmaster,
                        Rajah's Higher Secondary School,
                        Thanjavur – 613 009.                                      ... Respondents

                      Prayer:   Writ    petition     is    filed   under     Article   226      of    the
                      Constitution     of   India,    to    issue    a   Writ    of    Certiorarified
                      Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned
                      order in Na.Ka.No.2139/D3/2020 dated 11.11.2020 on the file
                      of the respondent No.6 and quash the same as illegal and
                      consequently for a direction, directing the respondents 3 and 4
                      to admit the petitioner in the MBBS Course based on his NEET
                      marks in any of the Government Medical College in accordance
                      with the Tamil Nadu Admission to Undergraduate Courses in
                      Medicine, Dentistry, Indian Medicine and Homeopathy on
                      preferential basis to students of Government Schools Act, 2020
                      (Tamil Nadu Act No.34 of 2020) and in the light of the Judgment
                      of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.Krishna Sradha V. State of
                      Andhra Pradesh reported in (2019) SCC Online SC 1609 within
                      the time period stipulated by this Court.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                      2/12
                                                              3       W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020




                              For Petitioner    : Mr.T.Aswin Rajasimman,
                                                 for Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy.


                              For R-1 to R-4    : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Advocate General
                                                         and
                                                  Mr.M. Sricharan Ranagarajan,
                                                  Additional Advocate General
                                                  assisted by Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss,
                                                  Special Government Pleader.

                              For R-5 to R-9    : Mrs.S.Srimathi,
                                                  Special Government Pleader and
                                                  Ms.J.Lakshmi Prasanna,
                                                  Government Advocate.



                                                  ORDER

The writ petitioner underwent his schooling from sixth

standard to twelfth standard in Rajah's Higher Secondary

School, Thanjavur. He scored 1003 marks out of 1200 in the

Higher Secondary examinations and 238 marks in the National

Eligibility cum Entrance Test(UG) – 2020. He belongs to

Scheduled Caste. His parents are eking out their livelihood by

running a roadside eatery on a pushcart. His request for

issuance of Bonafide Certificate certifying that he studied in a

Government school for the purpose of availing the benefit of

reservation provided under the Tamil Nadu Act No.34 of 2020

was negatived by the the Chief Educational Officer, Thanjavur,

http://www.judis.nic.in

4 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

vide communication bearing Na.Ka.No.2139/D3/2020 dated

11.11.2020. Questioning the same, this writ petition has been

filed.

2.The respondents have opposed the prayer made in the

writ petition. Their stand is that Rajah's Higher Secondary

School, Thanjavur is an aided private school and not a

government school. It is managed by an entity known as

Chattram Administration. The District Educational Officer,

Thanjavur, passes monthly grant bills for the teaching and non-

teaching staff. They are not considered as government servants.

It has a school committee and the provisions of Tamil Nadu

Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 and the Rules

framed thereunder are applicable to it. This being the factual

position, the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought for.

3.The learned Advocate General took me through the

provisions of Tamil Nadu Admission to Undergraduate Courses

in Medicine, Dentistry, Indian Medicine and Homeopathy on

Preferential basis to Students of Government Schools Act,

2020(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). It was promulgated to

ensure equitable distribution of medical seats for the

http://www.judis.nic.in

5 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

Government school students who are socially and economically

disadvantaged and who have qualified in the National Eligibility

Cum Entrance Test. The Act defines the expression “government

schools”. It is an exhaustive definition and it is not for the

Court to expand its scope. He wanted me to bear in mind the

principle of “ejusdem generis” while interpreting the provision.

Merely because the government officials are associated with the

administration of the school, that would not mean that the

school is managed by the government departments. According

to him, the categories of government school and private school

are mutually exclusive. One cannot be the other. When Rajah's

Higher Secondary School has always been treated as a private

school, the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's request

does not warrant any interference.

4.The issue that arises for my consideration is whether

the writ petitioner is entitled to claim the benefit under Tamil

Nadu Act 34 of 2020. For that, it must be shown that he studied

in a government school. The expressions “Government schools”

and “Students studied in Government schools” have been

defined in Section 2(c) and 2(d) of the Act as follows :



http://www.judis.nic.in

                                                                   6          W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020


                                        “2. ..
                                          (a) ..
                                          (b) ..
                                         (c)“Government schools” mean and

includes Government schools, Corporation schools, Municipal schools, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare schools, Kallar Reclamation schools, Forest Department schools and other schools managed by Government Departments.

(d)Students studied in Government schools” mean children who have studied from Sixth Standard to Higher Secondary Course in a Government school and qualified in the National Eligibility-cum- Entrance Test.”

Private school has been defined in Section 2(h) as a school which

is not a government school. It is relevant to note here that the

Act does not borrow or refer to the definition of a private school

set out in Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973.

The Act does not say that the schools governed by the Tamil

Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 will fall

within Section 2(h). While government schools have been

positively defined in Section 2(c), private school has been

http://www.judis.nic.in

7 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

negatively defined in Section 2(h). To find out whether the

school in question is a government school or not, I have to go by

the definitions set out in the Tamil Nadu Act No.34 of 2020 and

not venture outside. This is all the more so because the Act

contains an overriding provision. Section 3 of the Act states that

notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being

in force and subject to Section 5, seven and a half per cent of the

Government seats shall be set apart on preferential basis to

students studied in Government schools. If the petitioner is

treated as a student who studied in the government school

within the meaning of Section 2(d), then he is entitled to claim

the benefit of the Act notwithstanding the application of the

provisions of Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973

to the school in question all along.

5.The question whether Rajah's Higher Secondary

School, Thanjavur is a government school has to be answered by

referring to the position presently obtaining. Its historical origins

are not much relevant. The fact remains that the administration

was vested in the District Board and following its abolition in the

year 1961, it came under the control of the District

Administration vide G.O (Ms) No.2184, Rural Development and

http://www.judis.nic.in

8 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

Local Administration, dated 04.08.1961. As rightly contended

by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this position has been

accepted by the Government itself in an earlier writ proceeding

(order dated 30.04.2010 in WP No.12308 of 2005, C.Palanisamy

vs. State of Tamil Nadu).

6.It is true that there is a school committee. But it is

the District Collector, Thanjavur who is the President. The

Special Tahsildar is the Secretary. The members inter alia

include the District Revenue Officer, P.A. to District Collector

(General) and P.A. to District Collector (Accounts). The

membership is in ex-officio capacity. What matters in law is

substance and not the form. When construing documents, it is

not the nomenclature or the form that is determinative but the

content. Even in the case of incorporated companies, the veil is

lifted to ascertain the true character of the management in

certain circumstances.

7.The school no doubt has been treated as a private

school under Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools(Regulation)

Act, 1973. Its staff are not Government servants. But the fact

remains that it is managed by the Revenue Department/District

http://www.judis.nic.in

9 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

Administration. It is funded entirely by the Government. That

the Chattram Administration is managed by the Special

Tahsildar indicates the true character of the administration. The

key word occurring in Section 2(c) is “managed by government

department”. This statutory definition will have to receive a

purposive construction. The object of enacting this legislation is

to extend the benefit of reservation to economically

disadvantaged students who have passed out of Government

schools. Therefore, I have to adopt such a construction as would

effectuate the legislative object. The petitioner belongs to

Scheduled Caste community. The school is a Tamil Medium

school. More than anything else, it was the Special Tahsildar

who wrote to the Education Department seeking issuance of

Bonafide Certificate certifying that the petitioner was a student

who studied in government school. This clinches the issue in

favour of the petitioner.

8.When the writ petition came up for admission on

23.12.2020, the learned Judge felt that the petitioner must be

considered as a student who studied in government school and

gave interim direction to keep one seat vacant. During

counselling, the petitioner was allotted M.B.B.S. seat in

http://www.judis.nic.in

10 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

Sivagangai Medical College subject to the result of the writ

petition. Since I have held that the Rajah's Higher Secondary

school, Thanjavur, is a Government school within the meaning of

Section 2(c), the seat allocation made in favour of the writ

petitioner is made absolute.

9.The order impugned in this writ petition stands

quashed. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                          07.01.2021

                      Index    : Yes / No
                      Internet : Yes/ No
                      skm

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.

2. The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of School Education,Fort St. George, Chennai -9.

http://www.judis.nic.in

11 W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020

3. The Director of Medical Education, O/o. The Directorate of Medical Education, 162, Periyar E.V.R. High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

4. The Selection Committee, Rep. by the Secretary/Additional Director, Directorate of Medical Education, 162, Periyar E.V.R. High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

5. The Director of School Education, O/o. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 6.

6. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. The Chief Educational Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

7. The District Collector cum Chairman, Chattram Administration, Collectorate, Thanjavur District.

8. The Special Tahsildar, Chattram Administration, Thanjavur District.




http://www.judis.nic.in

                                12      W.P.(MD)NO.17835 OF 2020


                                 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.


                                                         skm




                              W.P.(MD)No.17835 of 2020




                                             07.01.2021



http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter