Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 27 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2021
W.P. No.20022 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.01.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P. No.20022 of 2020
and
WMP Nos.24696 and 24697 of 2020
Gurumurthy Vidhyashankar ... Petitioner
Vs
1. Union of India
rep. By its Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Shastri Bhawan
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road
New Delhi - 110 001.
2. Registrar of Companies
Tamil Nadu, Chennai
Block No.6, B Wing, II Floor
Shastri Bhawan
26 Haddows Road
Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records
of the second respondent relating to the impugned order dated 13.12.2019
uploaded and hosted on the website of the first respondent in so far as the
petitioner herein is concerned, quash the status "Disqualified under Section
164(2)" against his Director Identification Number (DIN No.02266906) as
illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merit and consequently, direct the
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.P. No.20022 of 2020
respondents to permit the petitioner to get reappointed as Director in any
company without any hindrance.
For petitioner ... Mr.P.Raj Kumar Jhabakh
For respondents ... Mr.Paresh Kannan, CGSC
ORDER
Mr.Paresh Kannan, learned CGSC takes notice for the respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the disqualification of
the petitioner as Director under Section 164(2)(a)of the Companies Act,
2013 on the ground that he has not submitted his financial statements for
three consecutive financial years. The petitioner has challenged the
impugned order dated 13.12.2019 passed by the second respondent on the
ground that without affording opportunity to the petitioner, the said order
has been passed.
3. Heard Mr.P.Raj Kumar Jhabakh, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Mr.Paresh Kannan, learned CGSC for the respondents.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.20022 of 2020
4. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
the impugned order has been passed in violation of the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013 and therefore the said order is bad in law.
5. The issue raised in this writ petition was considered by the Hon'ble
Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 09.10.2020 in W.A. No.569
& Ors. of 2020 in the case of Meetgelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan
Versus Union of India & Another and in paragraphs 36 and 38, it has
been held as follows :
36. As is evident from the above, Rules 9 and 10 deals with the application for allotment of DIN. Rule 10 (6) specifies that the DIN is valid for the life time of the applicant and shall not be allotted to any other person. Rule 11 provides for the cancellation or surrender or deactivation of the DIN. It is very clear upon examining Rule 11 that neither cancellation nor deactivation is provided for upon disqualification under Section 164(2) of CA 2013. In this connection, it is also pertinent to refer to Section 167(1) of CA 2013 which provides for vacating the office of director by a director of a Defaulting Company. As a corollary, it follows that if a person is a director of five companies, which may be referred to as companies A to E, if the default is committed by company A by not filing financial statements or annual returns, the said director of company A would incur disqualification and would vacate office as director of companies B to E. However, the said person
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.20022 of 2020
would not vacate office as director of company A. If such person does not vacate office and continues to be a director of company A, it is necessary that such person continues to retain the DIN. In this connection, it is also pertinent to point out that it is not possible to file either the financial statements or the annual returns without a DIN. Consequently, the director of Defaulting Company A, in the above example, would be required to retain the DIN so as to make good the deficiency by filing the respective documents. Thus, apart from the fact that the AQD Rules do not empower the ROC to deactivate the DIN, we find that such deactivation would also be contrary to Section 164(2) read with 167(1) of CA 2013 inasmuch as the person concerned would continue to be a director of the Defaulting Company.
38. In the result, these appeals are allowed by setting aside the impugned order dated 27.01.2020. Consequently, the publication of the list of disqualified directors by the ROC and the deactivation of the DIN of the Appellants is hereby quashed. As a corollary to our conclusion on the deactivation of DIN, the DIN of the respective directors shall be reactivated within 30 days of the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Nonetheless, we make it clear that it is open to the ROC concerned to initiate action with regard to disqualification subject to an enquiry to decide the question of attribution of default to specific directors by taking into account the observations and conclusions herein. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.20022 of 2020
6. The case on hand stands on the same footing. In the instant case,
also, no notice was given to the petitioner before disqualifying him as a
Director of the subject Company.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble
Division Bench of this Court, dated 09.10.2020 in W.A. No.569 & batch
applies to the facts of the instant case also.
8. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 13.12.2019 passed by the
second respondent disqualifying the petitioner as a Director of the subject
Company under Section 164(2) (a) of the Companies Act, 2013 is hereby set
aside in the terms indicated in the aforesaid judgment and the writ petition
is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are
closed.
04.01.2021
Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order vsi2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.20022 of 2020
To
1. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs Union of India Shastri Bhawan Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road New Delhi - 110 001.
2. The Registrar of Companies Tamil Nadu, Chennai Block No.6, B Wing, II Floor Shastri Bhawan 26 Haddows Road Chennai 600 006.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.20022 of 2020
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
W.P. No.20022 of 2020
04.01.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!