Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1996 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021
S.A.No.584 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATE: 29.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
S.A.No.584 of 2004
and C.M.P.No.4887 of 2004
1.Visuvasam Pandi
2.Selvanayagam (Died)
3.Palpandi (Died)
4.Durairaj
5.Sakthi
6.Marial
7.Grace
8.Latha
9.Johnmanikam
10.Rani
11.Selvaraj
12.Mohan
13.Santhosam
14.Christopher Asir
(Appellants 7 to 14 are brought on record as LRs of the
deceased A2 vide order dated 08.01.2021 made in
M.P.(MD)Nos.1 to 6 of 2012 in S.A.No.584 of 2004
15.Lilly
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.No.584 of 2004
16.Gelida
17.John Raj
18.Athisayaraja
19.Ilayaraja
(A15 to A19 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased
A3 vide order dated 08.01.2021 made in M.P.(MD)Nos.1 to 6 of 2012
in S.A.No.584 of 2004) ... Appellants
Vs.
1.Madurappa
2.Saradha
3.Martin Devanesan ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure
Code, against the decree and judgment dated 17.10.2003 in A.S.No.43 of 2002 on
the file of the learned Sub Judge, Paramakudi, confirming the decree and judgment
dated 28.06.2002 in O.S.No.22 of 1997 on the file of the learned District Munsif,
Mudhukulathur.
For Appellants : Mr.M.Suresh Babu
For Respondents : Mr.R.Sreenivasan for R1 & R2
R3-Dismissed vide order dated 04.04.2017.
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for
the appellants submitted that despite sending several letters to the appellants, they
have not turned up to give any instructions. It is clearly indicated that the
appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
http://www.judis.nic.in S.A.No.584 of 2004
2. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
29.01.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsm
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Sub Judge, Paramakudi.
2.The District Munsif, Mudhukulathur.
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in S.A.No.584 of 2004
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vsm
S.A.No.584 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.4887 of 2004
29.01.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!