Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Tamil Nadu Industrial ... vs T.Rathikala
2021 Latest Caselaw 1881 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1881 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021

Madras High Court
The Tamil Nadu Industrial ... vs T.Rathikala on 27 January, 2021
                                                      1

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 27.01.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                AND
                               THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

                                        W.A(MD)NO.1421 OF 2017
                                                 and
                                       C.M.P(MD)No.10635 of 2017


                      The Tamil Nadu Industrial Cooperative Bank Limited,
                      represented by its Branch Manager,
                      K.John Musthafa,
                                                         :Appellant/Third Party


                                             .vs.


                      1.T.Rathikala

                      2.The Chief Engineer,
                        P.W.D Water Resources Organization,
                        Chepak,
                        Chennai.                       :Respondent/Petitioner

                      3.The Superintending Engineer,
                        P.W.D Water Resources Organization,
                        Chepak,
                        Chennai.

                      4.The Executive Engineer,
                        P.W.D Water Resources Organization,
                        Mel Vaiparu Basin Region,
                        Rajapalayam,
                        Virudhunagar District.         : Respondents/Respondents

                      PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                      praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in

http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                         2

                      W.P(MD)No.4043 of 2017, dated 18.07.2017.


                                    For Appellant            :Mr.G.Arunachalam

                                    For Respondent-1         :Mrs.Lakshmi Gopinathan
                                                              for M/s.Polax Legal Solutions

                                                JUDGMENT

*************

[Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.]

This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed by this

Court in W.P(MD)No.4043 of 2017, dated 18.07.2017.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.The Original Writ Petitioner filed the Writ Petition for a

mandamus directing the respondents therein to disburse the death

gratuity, family pension, Provident Fund and all other monetary

benefits of the Petitioner's husband Late.Thirupathy Venkatachalam

to the Petitioner and to her children. After considering the plight of

the Petitioner, this Court, by order, dated 18.7.2017, directed the

fourth respondent herein to pay the Petitioner gratuity, family

pension including arrears of pension and other monetary benefits

payable to the Petitioner's husband within a period of four weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

http://www.judis.nic.in

4.The appellant herein is a third party, the Tamil Nadu

Industrial Co-operative Bank Limited,Sivakasi. According to the

appellant, the order is passed by the learned Single Judge without

considering the dues due to the appellant. Whether the appellant is

a necessary party in a mandamus is a question which is not gone

into. Now the learned counsel for the appellant himself has stated

that pursuant to the order of the learned Single Judge, already the

fourth respondent had paid the amount that were due to the

Petitioner payable to her deceased husband. Therefore, nothing

survives for further adjudication and it is open to the appellant to

recover the amount due to the Petitioner's husband in the manner

known to law, if so advised.

5.Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

[P.S.N.,J.] & [S.K.,J.] 27.01.2021

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized http://www.judis.nic.in

for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Chief Engineer, P.W.D Water Resources Organization, Chepak, Chennai.

2.The Superintending Engineer, P.W.D Water Resources Organization, Chepak, Chennai.

3.The Executive Engineer, P.W.D Water Resources Organization, Mel Vaiparu Basin Region, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

http://www.judis.nic.in

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA J.

AND S.KANNAMMAL, J.

vsn

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1421 OF 2017 and C.M.P(MD)No.10635 of 2017

http://www.judis.nic.in

27.01.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter