Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Amutha
2021 Latest Caselaw 1781 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1781 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Amutha on 27 January, 2021
                                                                               C.M.A.(MD)No.50 of 2021

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 27.01.2021

                                                      CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

                                            C.M.A(MD)No.50 of 2021
                                                    and
                                            C.M.P(MD)No.492 of 2021


                 The Managing Director,
                 S.E.T.C.No.2, Pallavan Road,
                 Chennai.                                         ... Appellant/Respondent

                                                         vs.

                 1. Amutha
                 2. Natarasu                                      ...Respondents/Claimants


                 PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor

                 Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.51 of

                 2019 dated 28.06.2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

                 (Additional Sessions Court Court), Karur.


                                     For Appellant       : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan


                                                     JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant against

the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.51 of 2019 dated 28.06.2019 on the

file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sessions Court Court,

Karur.

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.M.A.(MD)No.50 of 2021

2. The case of the respondents/claimants is that on 27.09.2015 at about

09.00 p.m, the Transport Corporation Bus bearing Registration No.TN 01 AN

0595, which was driven by the driver of the Transport Corporation came from

West to East in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the deceased Mayan @

Perumal, who was standing on the southern side of the road, due to that, the

deceased sustained serious head injury and died on the spot itself. In this regard, a

case in Crime No.694 of 2015 was registered in Karur Town Police Station, for the

offences under Sections 279 and 304(A) of I.P.C. The respondents/claimants, who

are daughter and son of the deceased filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.51 of

2019, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional Sessions

Court Court), Karur, claiming compensation, for the death of their father.

3. Before the Tribunal, the respondents/Claimants examined two

witnesses as P.Ws.1 and 2 and marked ten documents as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.5. On the

side of the appellant, no witness and document was marked.

4. The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence adduced on either side, has held that the driver of the transport

corporation bus was responsible for the accident and consequently, fastened the

liability on the appellant transport corporation to pay compensation of Rs.

5,12,000/- to the respondents/claimants with 7.5% interest per annum. Aggrieved

by the said award, the Transport Corporation has filed this appeal challenging both http://www.judis.nic.in the liability and quantum.

C.M.A.(MD)No.50 of 2021

5. On the aspect of liability, the learned counsel for the appellant would

state that the Tribunal ought to have considered that the deceased by violating the

traffic rules had suddenly crossed the road without noticing the corporation bus,

invited the accident, and therefore, the appellant is not liable to pay the

compensation. As regards quantum quantum, he would state that fixation of

monthly income of the deceased at Rs.6,000/- is erroneous and without any proof.

Except the above, the compensation under other heads are not disputed. learned

counsel for the appellant would submit that even though the deceased did not have

any income proof, the Tribunal has taken notional income of the deceased as Rs.

6,000/- and it is on the higher side and hence, he prays for reduction on the

quantum of compensation and the liability fastened on them is wrong and liable to

be set aside.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the materials

available on record.

7. Perusal of record shows that the daughter of the deceased examined

herself as PW1 and narrated the manner of accident as averred in the claim

petition. FIR has been registered against the driver of the transport corporation

bus. PW2 who is an eye-witness had stated about the manner of accident. Though

the appellant filed counter in the MCOP denying the manner of accident, they did

not let in any oral or documentary evidence to disprove the manner of accident. http://www.judis.nic.in Therefore, the Tribunal finding that the manner of accident is proved by the

C.M.A.(MD)No.50 of 2021

evidence of PW1 and PW2 and corroborated by Ex.P1-FIR and no rebuttal

evidence was let in by the appellant corporation, held that the driver of the

transport corporation was responsible for the accident. In my considered opinion,

the findings of the Tribunal regarding negligence cannot be said to be perverse or

without evidence and the same is confirmed.

8. As regards quantum, the claimants have claimed that the deceased was

an agricultural coolie and earned Rs.15,000/- per month. However, in the absence

of proof the Tribunal fixed a sum of Rs.6000/- per month as monthly income of the

deceased. In Syed Sadiq vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd., reported in

(2014) 2 SCC 735, even for a vegetable vendor the Hon'ble Supreme Court has

fixed the monthly income at Rs.6,500/- where there was no proof adduced.

Therefore, fixation of monthly income at Rs.6,000/- for an agricultural coolie

cannot be found fault with. The compensation under other heads are not disputed.

9. The appellant/Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire

award amount with interest and costs from the date of claim petition till the date of

deposit, less the amount already deposited, if any, to the credit of the claim

petition, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. On such deposit, the respondents/claimants are permitted to withdraw

their respective shares with proportionate accrued interest as apportioned by the

Tribunal interest without filing formal permission petition before the Tribunal. http://www.judis.nic.in

C.M.A.(MD)No.50 of 2021

10. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No

costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                                   27.01.2021

                 Index             : Yes/No
                 Internet : Yes/No
                 pkn




                 To

                 1.Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                   (Additional Sessions Court),
                   Karur.


                 2.The Record Keeper,
                   Vernacular Section,
                   Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                   Madurai.




http://www.judis.nic.in





                                C.M.A.(MD)No.50 of 2021




                                 J.NISHA BANU,J.



                                                  pkn




                           C.M.A(MD)No.50 of 2021
                                              and
                          C.M.P(MD)No.492 of 2021




                                         27.01.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in





 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter