Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Seoyon E-Hwa Automotive Chennai vs The Assistant Commissioner Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1774 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1774 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021

Madras High Court
Seoyon E-Hwa Automotive Chennai vs The Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 27 January, 2021
                                                                                 W.P. No.2336 of 2020



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 27.01.2021

                                                     CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

                                                 W.P. No.2336 of 2020
                                                         and
                                                 W.M.P.No.2772 of 2020

                Seoyon E-Hwa Automotive Chennai
                Private Limited
                Represented by its Chief Financial Officer
                Mr.Dong Ho Lee
                                                                               …Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                Corporate Circle - 6(1)
                121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
                Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.

                                                                                ...Respondent

                PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files
                of the respondent herein in 20121182746 dated 30.12.2019 consequently quash
                the same.
                                         For Petitioner     : Ms.Durgasri
                                                              For Mr.V.Veeraraghavan
                                         For Respondent     : Mr.A.P.Srinivas

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/


                1/5
                                                                                            W.P. No.2336 of 2020



                                                                Senior Standing Counsel


                                                            ORDER

Heard Ms.Durgasri, learned for Mr.V.Veeraghavan,, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the

revenue.

2. The impugned order of assessment, passed in terms of the provisions

of Section 147 read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is dated

30.12.2019. When the matter came up for admission on 31.01.2020, I have

passed the following order:

Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respon­ dents and seeks some time to obtain instructions and file a counter.

2. The impugned proceedings for re-assessment relate to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2012-13. Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act') has been issued on the last day of expiry of limitation, i.e., 30.03.2019, in any event beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year.

3. On 12.04.2019, the petitioner has complied with the requirement of filing of re­ turn and sought reasons. This communication appears to have filed before the Of­ fice of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, received on 12.04.2019.

4. On 08.11.2019, a show cause notice was issued, once again calling upon the petitioner to file a response to notice under Section 148 of the Act. Under reply dated 28.11.2019, again filed before the Office of the Additional/Joint Commis­ sioner of Income Tax, the petitioner reiterated the supply of reasons.

5. On 26.12.2019, reasons have been furnished and on the same day a question­ naire under Section 142(1) issued, calling upon the assessee to explain why re-as­ sessment not be completed as proposed in the notice and listing the matter on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P. No.2336 of 2020

27.12.2019, at 11.00 a.m. On 30.12.2019, some time for reply is sought by the pe­ titioner.

6. However, the order of assessment has been passed on the same day, i.e., on 30.12.2019, impugned in this Writ Petition.

7. The procedure for re-assessment in line with the prescription of the Supreme Court in GKN Drive Shafts V. ITO (259 ITR 1) appears prima facie not to have been followed. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted below:

We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee is to file re­ turn and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as the reasons have been disclosed in these pro­ ceedings, the assessing officer has to dispose of the objections, if filed, by passing a speaking Order before proceeding with the assessment in re­ spect of the abovesaid five assessment years.

8. Moreover and prima facie, there has been patent disregard to the principles of natural justice, as may be seen from the sequence of dates and events narrated above.

9. Interim stay of recovery alone.

10. List on 25.02.2020. Counter be filed by then with an advance copy served on the petitioner.

3. The sequence of dates and events set out above are not in dispute and

I am thus of the view that there is a violation in following the procedure for re-

assessment as set out by the Supreme Court in the case of GKN Drive Shafts V.

ITO (259 ITR 19) where in conclusion, the Bench states as follows:

We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P. No.2336 of 2020

noticee is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order’.

4. In the light of the above, the impugned order dated 30.12.2019 is set

aside. The petitioner is permitted to file objections to the assumption of

jurisdiction within a period of four (4) weeks from date of uploading of this

order and an order be passed either accepting or rejecting the same within a

period of three (3) weeks from date of receipt of objections, after hearing the

petitioner. Proceedings for assessment, if any all, shall be initiated in

accordance with law, thereafter.

5. The Writ Petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. No costs.

Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

27.01.2021

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non speaking Order Sl

To

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle - 6(1) 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P. No.2336 of 2020

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

sl

W.P. No.2336 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.2772 of 2020

27.01.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter