Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd vs M/S.Elder Projects Limited
2021 Latest Caselaw 1649 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1649 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S. Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd vs M/S.Elder Projects Limited on 25 January, 2021
                                               C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 25.01.2021

                                                          CORAM:

                                     THE HON'BLE JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

                                                  C.S.No.350 of 2020
                                           and O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020
                                                and A.No.2910 of 2020


                   M/s. Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.,
                   29, III Floor, SIDCO Garment Complex,
                   Guindy, Chennai 600 032
                   rep by its Authorised Signatory,
                   D.Jude F.L.S.Durai Pandian                                                     ... Plaintiff
                                                     ..Vs..

                   M/s.Elder Projects Limited,
                   301-302, 3rd Floor, Plot No.174,
                   Kunthu Commerce Centre,
                   Near Ayyappa Temple, Bangur Nagar,
                   Goregaon West, Mumbai 400 090.                                               ... Defendant



                   PRAYER :            Plaint filed under and Order VII Rule 1 CPC and Order IV

                   Rule 1 of Original Side Rules, Read With Sections 27, 28, 29, 134, 135 of

                   the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55, 62 of the Copyrights Act,

                   1957, prayed for a Judgment and Decree:-




                  1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                 C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020


                                   (a) a Permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its

                   partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or any

                   one claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing the

                   plaintiff's registered trademarks ZINCOVIT under No.487453 in Class 5 and

                   other registered trademarks by using a deceptively similar trademark

                   ZINCODER or any other trademark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's

                   registered trademark or in any other manner whatsoever;



                                   (b) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its

                   partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or any

                   one claiming through or under them from in any manner committing acts of

                   copyright infringement by using, in the course of trade, labels / artistic

                   works which are a substantial reproduction of plaintiff's registered copyright

                   under Nos. A-112789/2017 and other registered copyrights in colour

                   scheme, get up and layout for their ZINCODER for any syrup, drops tablets

                   etc., or in any other manner whatsoever;



                                   (c) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its

                   partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or any


                  2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020


                   one claiming through or under them from in any manner passing off and / or

                   enabling others to pass off the defendant' products under the trademark

                   ZINCODER as and for the plaintiffs' products by manufacturing, selling or

                   offering to sell, distributing, displaying, printing, stocking, using,

                   advertising their products with a trademark and / or label or artistic work

                   that is identical in colour scheme, get up and layout with that of the

                   plaintiff's ZINCODERM or ZINCOVIT trademark or artistic work or in any

                   other manner whatsoever;



                                   (d) the defendant be ordered to surrender to plaintiffs for

                   destruction of all products, labels, cartons, dyes, blocks, moulds, screen

                   prints, packing materials and other materials bearing the trademark

                   ZINCODER label or any mark deceptively similar to plaintiffs' trademarks

                   ZINCODERM/ZINCOVIT and the artistic work ZINCOVIT label.



                                   (e) a preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs

                   directing the defendant to render account to profits made by use of

                   trademark and copyright in the artistic work ZINCODER label and a final

                   decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs for the amount of profits thus


                  3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                   C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020


                   found to have been made by the defendant after the latter have rendered

                   accounts;



                                   (f) for costs of the suit.



                                       For Plaintiff                   : M/s.R.Sathish Kumar

                                       For Defendant                   : M/s.V.M.Venkatramana

                                                                *******



                                                          JUDGMENT

The plaintiff and the defendant have entered into a compromise

and recording the same the Memorandum of Compromise dated 11.01.2021

had been presented in Court on 20.01.2021. This Memorandum of

Compromise had been signed by the Chief Vigilance Officer on behalf of the

plaintiff and by the Legal Executive of the defendant. The learned counsel

for the plaintiff and the learned counsel for the defendant have also signed in

the Memorandum of Compromise.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020

2. The relevant portions of the Memorandum of Compromise are

as follows:

"2. The Defendant approached the plaintiff for

amicable settlement of the dispute and the plaintiff also

agreed to settle the dispute on the following terms and

conditions reduced hereunder;

a. That the defendant undertakes that it will not

manufacture or market or otherwise deal with the products

bearing the trademark ZINCODER or any other

trademark identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's

product ZINCOVIT and / or ZINCODERM at point of any

point in future whatsoever and has agreed to change their

trademark to ELCOPLEX-ZC which is agreed by the

plaintiff.

b. The plaintiff and defendant pray that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020

above suit may be decreed in terms of Prayers (a), (b) and

(c) of Paragraph 35 of the Plaint and the plaintiff is

willing to give up the reliefs under Prayers 35(d), 35(e),

35(f) and 35(g) of the Suit in view of this Memorandum of

Compromise.

c. That the Defendant undertakes to the plaintiff

that in the event of breach of this undertaking to this

Hon'ble Court, they are liable for punitive damages to the

plaintiff in addition to any other legal right available to

the plaintiff.

In the above circumstances, it is prayed that this

Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass a Judgment and

Decree in terms of the Memo of Compromise and pass

such further or other order which may deem fit and proper

to the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render

justice."

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020

3. In view of the same, suit is decreed in terms of Memorandum of

Compromise. No order as to costs. Consequently, the connected

Application and Original Applications are closed. The Memorandum of

Compromise shall form part of the Decree.

25.01.2021 Index : Yes / No Web : Yes / No rna

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.350 of 2020, O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020, A.No.2910 of 2020

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J

rna

C.S.No.350 of 2020 and O.A.Nos.657, 658, 659 of 2020 and A.No.2910 of 2020

25.01.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter