Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.S. Venmathi vs V.R. Sundara Raj
2021 Latest Caselaw 1472 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1472 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2021

Madras High Court
R.S. Venmathi vs V.R. Sundara Raj on 22 January, 2021
                                                                                T.O.S.No.16 of 2017




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                     DATED : 22.01.2021
                                                         CORAM:
                                    THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE R. PONGIAPPAN

                                       Testamentary Original Suit No.16 of 2017 in
                                                 (O.P.No.613 of 2016)


                     R.S. Venmathi                                                ... Plaintiff
                                                            Vs.
                     V.R. Sundara raj                                                .. Defendant

                     Original Petition No.613 of 2016 was filed under Sections 232 and 276 of
                     Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 for the grant of letters of
                     Administration. Against this petition a Caveat was filed on 28.06.2016 by
                     the Caveators. As per order of this Court, the Original Petition No.613 of
                     2016 was converted into Testamentary Original Suit No.16 of 2017.


                                     For Plaintiff       : Mr.S. Prabakar
                                     For Respondent      : No appearance.

                                                      JUDGMENT

This suit has been originally filed for grant of Letters of

Administration in respect of the Will left by one V.R. Perumal, in favour of

the Plaintiff, who is adopted daughter. subsequently, the Original Petition

has been converted as suit in view of the caveat filed by the defendant

herein. Against this petition a Caveat was filed on 28.06.2016 by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.1/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

Caveator and as per order of this Court, the Original Petition No.613 of

2016 was converted into Testamentary Original Suit No.16 of 2017.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the suit is as follows :

It is stated by the plaintiff that the Testator Mr.V.R. Perumal is her

paternal aunt's husband. She is the adopted daughter of the deceased

V.R.Perumal and Andalammal. The wife and parents of the deceased

V.R.Perumal predeceased him. During his lifetime he has executed his Last

Will and Testament on 06.04.2015 in favour of the plaintiff. Thereafter, he

died on 24.04.2016. Hence, the plaintiff filed petition in O.P.No.613 of

2016 for Letters of Administration. Against this petition a Caveat was filed

by the Caveator and as per order of this Court, the Original Petition was

converted into a Testamentary Suit.

3. Since the defendant has neither appeared through counsel nor in

person and the written statement was also not filed, the Defendant was set

exparte and the matter was directed to be listed before the learned Master

for recording exparte evidence.

4. In this suit the Plaintiff was examined as P.W.1 and Ex.P.1 to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.2/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

Ex.P.3 were marked through her. The first attesting witness in the Will, Mrs.

S. Stella was examined as P.W.2 and the second attesting witness Mr.

Banjamin was examined as P.W.3.

Exhibits produced on the side of the plaintiff:

S.No Exhibits Date Description of documents

1. P-1 06.04.2016 The original registered Will and Testament executed on 06.04.2016 by Mr.V.R. Perumala in favour of the Plaintiff, which has been attested by two witnesses viz., Mrs.S.Stella and Mr.Benjamin

2. P-2 03.05.2013 The computer generated copy of the death certificate of Andalammal

3. P-3 24.04.2015 The computer generated copy of the death certificate of the Testator Mr.V.R. Perumal

Witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiffs:

P.W.1. - Mrs. R.S.Venmathi P.W.2. - Mrs. S. Stella P.W.3. - Mr. Benjamin

5. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the plaintiff that the

Plaintiff is the adopted daughter of the deceased V.R. Perumal and

Anadalammal. The wife and the parents of the deceased V.R.Perumal

predeceased him. Mr. V.R. Perumal possessed with property within channai

and State of Tamilnadu, within the jurisdiction of the Court. Learned

counsel for the Plaintiff further states that Ex.P.1 is the Last Will and

Testament of the deceased V.R.Perumal which was duly executed by him on

the 1st day of April 2015, and registered on 06.04.2015 in the office of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.3/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

Sub-Registrar, Thousandlights, chennai, in the presence of the witnesses.

6. It is the further contention of the learned counsel that the Plaintiff

filed a petition before this Court for the Letters of Administration of the

Will of the deceased to be issued in his favour as there is no next kin or

other persons interested to be impleaded. Subsequently, after objection from

the Defendant side, it was converted into a Testamentary Original Suit.

7. Learned counsel further states that no other application made to

any District Court or High Court for the Probate of any Will of the said

deceased or Letters of administration with or without the Will annexed of

his property and credits. The Plaintiff is ready to undertake to administer the

property and credits of the said deceased and in any way concerning the

Will by paying first his debts and then the legacies therein bequathed so far

as the assets will extend and to make a full and true investory thereof and

exhibit the same in this court within six months from the date of grant of

Letters of Administration and render to this Court a true account of the said

property and credits within one year from the said date.

8. As the defendant had entered caveat, and opposed the Will, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.4/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

Original Petition was converted as Testamentary Original Suit. Thereafter,

there was no representation on behalf of the Defendant. Hence the

defendant was set exparte.

9. It is not in dispute that the suit property originally belonged to Mr.

V.R. Perumal. He executed his Last Will and Testament on 1.4.2016 and

registered on 06.04.2016. Ex.P.1 proves the same. In the said Will P.W.2

and P.W.3 are attesting witnesses. The have given evidence regarding the

execution of the Will. Ex.P.2 is the death certificate of Mrs.Andalammal,

wife of the Testator, predeceased him. Ex.P.2 Death Certificate of Mrs.

Andalammal proves the same. Ex.P.3 is Death Certificate of the Testator

Mr.V.R. Perumal. The defendant is the brother of the Testator who filed

caveat and resisted the petition filed for Letters of Administration, was set

expate. Several opportunities were given to him to appear before this Court

and to file his written statement. But neither the learned counsel nor the

defendant have filed the written statement. Hence, this court has taken into

consideration of the documents and evidence submitted by the plaintiff side.

The above documents proved that there is no other legal heirs to the

Testator other than the Defendant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.5/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

10. The Will, Ex.P.1, is a registered Will and executed by Mr.V.R.

Perumal. Ex.P.1, when carefully seen, in all pages of the Will, he had signed

and the contents of the Will had been explained to the testator on the date of

execution, viz., 06.04.2016 and P.W.2 and P.W.3 stood as attesting

witnesses.

11. P.W.2 and P.W.3 were being the attesting witnesses, examined to

prove the execution of the Will by Mr.V.R. Perumal. They have clearly

stated in their evidence about their attestation in Will and the execution of

the Will by the testator while he was in a sound state of mind and the same

has not been rebutted by the defendant. Hence, their evidence not only

prove attestation but also execution of the Will by the testator. All the

above, clearly show that the Will has been proved in the manner known to

law. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to the Letters of Administration.

12. In the result,

(i). The suit in T.O.S.No.16 of 2016 is decreed.

(ii). The Letters of Administration, having the effect

limited to the State of Tamil Nadu, shall be issued in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.6/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

favour of the plaintiff in respect of the Will executed

on 06.04.2016 by Mr.V.R. Perumal in favour of the

Plaintiff Mrs.R.S. Venmathi.

(iii). The plaintiff is directed to duly administer the

estate of the deceased.

(iv). The plaintiff shall execute a security bond for a

sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand

only) in favour of the Assistant Registrar (O.S-II), High

Court, Madras.

(v). The plaintiff is further directed to render true and

correct accounts once in a year.

(vi). No costs.

22.01.2021

Index:Yes/no Internet: Yes ggs

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.7/8 T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

R.PONGIAPPAN,J.

ggs

T.O.S.No.16 of 2017

22.01.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Page No.8/8

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter