Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1242 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2021
S.A.(MD)Nos451, 453 and 454 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
S.A.(MD)Nos.451, 453 and 454 of 2005
and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.3556, 3558 and 3559 of 2005
and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015
H.Muthaliff ... Appellant in
S.A.(MD)No.451/2005
M.B.Seeni Mohammed ... Appellant in
S.A.(MD)No.453/2005
Meivazhi Sevvel Anandhar ... Appellant in
S.A.(MD)No.454/2005
Vs.
Dhakshinamara Nadar Sangam
Tirunelveli Junction
Rep. by its Secretary
Commissioner
M.S.Arunachala Nadar ... Respondent in
all the S.As.
COMMON PRAYER: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code, against the decree and judgment dated 27.07.2004 rendered in
A.S.Nos.191, 213 and 199 of 2002 on the file of the First Additional Subordinate
Judge, Madurai, reversing the decree and judgments dated 30.07.2002, 05.08.2002
and 30.07.2002 rendered in O.S.No.1674 of 1993, O.S.No.345 of 1994 and
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)Nos451, 453 and 454 of 2005
O.S.No.1688 of 1993 on the file of the Principal District Munsif of Madurai
Town.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Aravindhan
(In all S.As)
For Respondent : Mr.R.T.Arivukumar
(In all S.As)
COMMON JUDGMENT
These Second Appeals are filed against the decree and judgment dated
27.07.2004 rendered in A.S.Nos.191, 213 and 199 of 2002 on the file of the First
Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai, reversing the decree and judgments dated
30.07.2002, 05.08.2002 and 30.07.2002 rendered in O.S.No.1674 of 1993,
O.S.No.345 of 1994 and O.S.No.1688 of 1993 respectively on the file of the
Principal District Munsif of Madurai Town.
2. When these Second Appeals are taken up for hearing, it is
submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the tenants
have already been vacated from the premises and there is no arrears of rent due or
payable by the appellant to the respondent. Therefore, these Second Appeals have
become infractuous, as nothing survives for further adjudication in these Second
Appeals. The said statement is recorded.
2/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)Nos451, 453 and 454 of 2005
3. The said fact is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the
appellant.
4. In such view of the matter, these Second Appeals are dismissed as
infractuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also
closed.
20.01.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
vsm
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19
pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official
purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is
presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the
advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The First Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai.
2.The Principal District Munsif, Madurai Town.
3.The Section Officer,
Vernacular Records,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
3/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)Nos451, 453 and 454 of 2005
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vsm
S.A.(MD)Nos.451, 453 and 454 of 2005 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.3556, 3558 and 3559 of 2005 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015
20.01.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!