Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs P.Damodaran
2021 Latest Caselaw 1083 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1083 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2021

Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs P.Damodaran on 19 January, 2021
                                                                 T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATE: 19.01.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                                     AND
                                   THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                         T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010 and
                                             M.P. No. 1 of 2010 ( 5 MPs)


                     Commissioner of Income Tax,
                     Chennai.                                       ... Appellant in all TCAs

                                                         v.


                     P.Damodaran,
                     26/27, Errabalu Chetty Street,
                     Chennai – 600 001.                           ... Respondent in all TCAs




                     T.C.A. No.1024/2010 : Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the
                     Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate
                     Tribunal, Madras, “D” Bench, dated 13.02.2009 in ITA.No.825/Mds/08
                     for the Assessment Year 1998-99.


                     T.C.A. No.1025/2010 : Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the

                     Page 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                   T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010

                     Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate
                     Tribunal, Madras, “D” Bench, dated 13.02.2009 in ITA.No.826/Mds/08
                     for the Assessment Year 1999-2000.


                     T.C.A. No.1026/2010 : Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the
                     Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate
                     Tribunal, Madras, “D” Bench, dated 13.02.2009 in ITA.No.827/Mds/08
                     for the Assessment Year 2000-2001.


                     T.C.A. No.1027/2010 : Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the
                     Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate
                     Tribunal, Madras, “D” Bench, dated 13.02.2009 in ITA.No.828/Mds/08
                     for the Assessment Year 2002-2003.


                     T.C.A. No.1028/2010 : Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the
                     Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate
                     Tribunal, Madras, “D” Bench, dated 13.02.2009 in ITA.No.829/Mds/08
                     for the Assessment Year 2003-2004.


                               For Appellant    : Ms.S.Premalatha, Junior Standing Counsel
                                                  for Mr.M.Swaminathan,
                                                  Senior Standing Counsel

                               For Respondent   : Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar
                                                  for Mr.G.Baskar



                     Page 2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                         T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010

                                                COMMON JUDGMENT
                                   (Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.)



                               We have heard Ms.S.Premalatha, learned Standing Counsel for

                     the appellant/Revenue and Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel for

                     the respondent.



                               2. These appeals, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the

                     Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) are directed against the order

                     dated         13.02.2009   made    respectively      in   ITA.Nos.825/Mds/08,

                     826/Mds/08, 827/Mds/08, 828/Mds/08 & 829/Mds/08 on the file of the

                     Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, ''C'' Bench (for brevity, the

                     Tribunal) for the Assessment Years 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-2001,

                     2002-2003 and 2003-2004.



                               3. The appeals were admitted on 07.02.2011 on the following

                     substantial question of law:

                                            “Whether    on    the      facts   and    in   the
                                      circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in


                     Page 3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                      T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010

                                     allowing the 801B deduction on 100%            profits
                                     returned, as against the 45% of the profits relatable
                                     to production of Heat Shrinkable Sleeve - HSS
                                     produced by the assessee, which was one of the 17
                                     item in the CJK?”



                               4. The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that the

                     above appeals are not pursued by the Revenue on account of the Low

                     Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by

                     the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary

                     limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been

                     increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in all

                     the cases are less than the threshold limit.



                               5. In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeals

                     are dismissed on account of the Low Tax Effect. The substantial question

                     of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect in all these cases

                     are above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty is granted

                     to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeals to

                     be heard and decided on merits. No costs. Consequently, the connected

                     Page 4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010

                     Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.



                                                               [M.D., J.]   [T.V.T.S., J.]
                                                                      19.01.2021

                     Index : Yes/No
                     Internet : Yes

                     Rj

                     To

                     The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, ''D'' Bench




                     Page 5/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                           T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010


                                               M. DURAISWAMY, J.

and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.

Rj

T.C.A.Nos.1024 to 1028 of 2010 and M.P. No. 1 of 2010 ( 5 MPs)

19.01.2021

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter