Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1004 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2021
TCA.No.679 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.01.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Tax Case Appeal No.679 of 2019
Swaminathan Sridhar ...Appellant
Vs
Commissioner of Income Tax-6,
121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 31.05.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai made in I.T.A.No.535/Mds/2016 for the assessment year 2011-12.
For Appellant : Mr.N.V.Balaji
For Respondent : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar
Senior Standing Counsel
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.679 of 2019
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order dated
31.05.2017 made in I.T.A.No.535/Mds/2016 on the file of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'B' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for the
assessment year 2011-12.
2.The appeal was admitted on 09.12.2020 on the following
substantial questions of law:
“1.Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in upholding the order of the lower authorities that SAR is taxable as perquisite?
2.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in not adjudicating the several grounds raised by the appellant and thereby not giving an opportunity of being heard?”
3.We have heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.679 of 2019
appellant/assessee and Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing
Counsel appearing for the respondent/Revenue.
4.The learned counsel on behalf of the appellant/assessee submits
that the appellant/assessee already filed the declaration/ undertaking under
the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme on 28.12.2020 and is awaiting orders to be
passed in Form No.3.
5.In the light of the subsequent event, the Competent Authority shall
process the application/declaration in accordance with the Direct Tax Vivad
Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and pass appropriate orders as
expeditiously as possible. The assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal
in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration filed by the
assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If
such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without
insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in
restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing
a miscellaneous petition for restoration, the Registry shall place such
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.679 of 2019
petition before the appropriate Division Bench for orders.
6.The tax case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned
liberty and Consequently, the substantial questions of law framed are left
open. No costs.
(T.S.S.,J.) (R.N.M.,J.)
08.01.2021
cse
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai.
2.Commissioner of Income Tax-6, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.679 of 2019
T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J
cse
TCA.No.679 of 2019
18.01.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!