Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5055 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021
Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Spencer and Company Ltd.,
Spencer Plaza,
769, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 032. ... Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
"B" Bench, dated 20.04.2012 passed in I.T.A.No.440/Mds/2011.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan
for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Page 1/5
Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.)
This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), is directed against the order
dated 20.04.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
"B" Bench, ('the Tribunal' for brevity) in I.T.A.No.440/Mds/2011 for the
assessment year 2002-03. The above appeal has been admitted on
04.01.2013 on the following Substantial Questions of Law:
"1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs.2899.68 lakhs transferred by the assessee to its general reserve on amalgamation is not taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in cancelling the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act ?”
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 2/5 Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
2. We have heard Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan for
M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.
3. It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the Substantial
Questions of Law framed for consideration on account of certain
subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for
resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or
incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the
President on 17th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on
17th March 2020.
4.Learned counsel for the respondent/assessee submitted that the
assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and that the
respondent/assessee had already been issued with Form–3 on
09.02.2021.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 3/5 Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
5.Since the respondent/assessee had been issued with Form-3,
nothing survives for adjudication in the above appeal. Recording the
submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent/assessee, the
Tax Case Appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
Index : Yes/No 25.02.2021
Internet : Yes
mkn
To
1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "B" Bench
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 4/5 Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
mkn
Tax Case Appeal No.474 of 2012
25.02.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 5/5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!