Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Branch Manager vs Selvarani
2021 Latest Caselaw 4989 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4989 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021

Madras High Court
Branch Manager vs Selvarani on 25 February, 2021
                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED 25.02.2021

                                                       CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

                                             C.M.A(MD) No.1503 of 2010
                                                       and
                                               M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2010
                                                       and
                                             C.M.P(MD)No.10384 of 2016

                      Branch Manager,
                      The New India Assurance Co., Ltd.,
                      Rajapalayam.                       .. Appellant/Respondent-2


                                                       vs.

                      1.Selvarani
                      2.Vigneswari
                      3.Harishkumar                           .. Respondents 1 to 3/Petitioners
                      4.Selvarani

                      (2nd respondent declared as major and
                       guardianship discharged vide Court
                       Order dated 01.09.2016)

                          (Suo motu the 3rd respondent declared as major and
                           guardianship discharged vide Court
                           Order dated 25.02.2021)            .. Respondent-4/Respondent-1




                      1/8


http://www.judis.nic.in
                      Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                      Vehicles Act 1988, against the award dated 17.03.2010 and made in
                      M.C.O.P.No.180 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
                      Tribunal, Sub Court, Srivilliputhur and praying to set aside the same.


                                   For Appellant        :Mr.D.Sivaraman
                                   For R1 to R3         :Mr.S.Kadarkarai
                                   For R4              : No appearance

                                                   JUDGMENT

The wife and two minor children of the deceased Godhandaramulu

filed M.C.O.P.No.180 of 2006 before the Motor Accident claims

Tribunal, Sub Court, Sirvilliputhur claiming compensation of

Rs.10,00,000/-.

2. It is their case that on 27.04.2006 the deceased Godhandaramulu

was an occupant in a Qualis Car bearing Registration No.TN-63-C-3232

and when the vehicle was proceeding from Madurai to Rajapalayam, the

driver drove it in a rash and negligent manner and hit against the

Tamarind tree, in which, he sustained injuries and died on the spot.

http://www.judis.nic.in

3. The counter affidavit has been filed by the appellant to oppose

the claim petition stating that the first claimant is the owner of the

offending vehicle and the deceased cannot be termed as 3rd party and

hence, the claim petition itself is not maintainable. The age and income

of the deceased were also denied and disputed by the appellant.

4. Before the Tribunal, on behalf of the claimants, P.Ws.1 & 2 were

examined and 6 documents were marked as Ex.P1 to Ex.P6. The

appellant examined one witness as R.W.1 and produced three documents

as Ex.R1 to Ex.R3.

5. The first claimant deposed before the Tribunal that he along

with deceased travelled in the offending vehicle at the time of accident

and it occurred due to the negligence of its driver. She also produced

Ex.P1-FIR, Ex.P3-Motor Vehicle Inspector report, Ex.P-4-charge-sheet.

The respondents have not seriously disputed the accident and it was their

main contention that the owner herself cannot maintain the claim

petition.

http://www.judis.nic.in

6. It is relevant to note that the claim petition came to be filed by

the wife and minor children of the deceased. Admittedly, the first

claimant was the owner of the offending vehicle. It appears that during

the pendency of the claim petition, a memo was filed before the Tribunal

for relinquishing her right in the claim petition. The Tribunal based on

the evidence of P.W.1, Ex.P.1 and Ex.P4 rightly held that the accident

occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle.

7. It is the contention of Mr.D.Sivaraman, learned counsel for the

appellant, that the Tribunal has erred in awarding the entire claim making

the Insurance Company liable to pay the amount.

8. Per contra, Mr.S.Kadarkarai, learned counsel appearing for the

claimants would state that the deceased was working as an Assistant

Executive Engineer in TNEB and based on the salary, the Tribunal has

passed reasonable award, which does not require any interference in the

award of the Tribunal. I find force in the submission of the learned

counsel for the claimants.

http://www.judis.nic.in

9. The contention of the appellant that they are not liable to pay

compensation was rejected by the Tribunal since the offending vehicle

had a package policy at the time of accident and the deceased was treated

as a 3rd party. The deceased in this case was an Assistant Executive

Engineer and he died at the age of 38 years. The salary certificate of the

deceased Ex.P6 shows that he was paid Rs.8,500/- per month. From

which, 1/3rd was deducted for his personal expenses, and his contribution

was taken Rs.5,424/-. By applying multiplier '16', an amount of

Rs.10,41,408/- was arrived at as loss of income. In addition, Rs.10,000/-

was awarded for loss of love and affection. Though the total amount

comes to Rs.10,51,408/-, but the Tribunal has awarded a sum of

Rs.10,00,000/- as the claim is only Rs.10,00,000/-.

10. It is settled law that the Tribunal has to award just

compensation and need not be restricted to the amount mentioned in the

claim petition. So, I am of the view that the claimants 2 & 3/Respondents

2 & 3 would be entitled for Rs.10,51,408/- with interest at the rate of

7.5% per annum.

http://www.judis.nic.in

11. For the reasons stated above, the appeal fails and the same is

dismissed. The claimants 2 & 3 were minors at the time of filing the

claim petition and the second claimant was declared as major on

01.09.2016. By this time, the third claimant Harishkumar also should

have become major and hence, the third respondent herein is suo motu

declared as major. The award amount shall be shared by the claimants 2

& 3 equally.

12. In that view, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed, as

devoid of merits. The appellant is directed to deposit the entire award

amount with accrued interest and costs, less the amount already

deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt

of a copy of this order. On such deposit being made, the respondents 2 &

3/Claimants 2 & 3 are permitted to withdraw the amount equally by

making necessary application before the Tribunal. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                      Index:Yes/No                                       25.02.2021
                      Internet:Yes/No
                      am




http://www.judis.nic.in
                      To

                      1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                        Sub Court, Srivilliputhur

                      2.The Record Keeper,
                        Vernacular Section,
                        Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                        Madurai.







http://www.judis.nic.in
                            K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J

                                                  am




                               JUDGMENT MADE IN

                            C.M.A(MD) No.1503 of 2010




                                           25.02.2021







http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter