Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4874 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021
Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Circle 3(1),
Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Tamil Nadu Warehousing
Corporation Limited
82, Anna Salai, Guindy,
Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
"B" Bench, dated 23.09.2015 passed in I.T.A.No.1366/Mds/2015.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Ms.S.Kavitha
for M/s.Sushma Harini
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Page 1/5
Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.)
This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), is directed against the order
dated 23.09.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
"B" Bench, ('the Tribunal' for brevity) in I.T.A.No.1366/Mds/2015 for
the assessment year 2010-2011. The above appeal has been admitted on
28.03.2016 on the following Substantial Question of Law:
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the provision for leave encashment is an allowable expenditure ignoring the provisions of Section 43B(f)?"
2. We have heard Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Ms.S.Kavitha for M/s.Sushma
Harini, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.
3. It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the Substantial
Questions of Law framed for consideration on account of certain
subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 2/5 Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for
resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or
incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the
President on 17th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on
17th March 2020.
4.Learned counsel for the respondent/assessee submitted that the
assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and that the
respondent/assessee had already been issued with Form–3 on
02.02.2021.
5.Since the respondent/assessee had been issued with Form-3,
nothing survives for adjudication in the above appeal. Recording the
submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent/assessee, the
Tax Case Appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
Index : Yes/No 24.02.2021
Internet : Yes
mkn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 3/5 Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
To
1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "B" Bench
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(1), Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 4/5 Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
mkn
Tax Case Appeal No.227 of 2016
24.02.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 5/5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!