Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs T.L.Prashanth
2021 Latest Caselaw 4871 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4871 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021

Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs T.L.Prashanth on 24 February, 2021
                                                                                T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATE: 24.02.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                                     AND
                                   THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                    T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

                     Commissioner of Wealth Tax,
                     Chennai.                                                      ... Appellant
                                                             Vs.

                     T.L.Prashanth                                                 ... Respondent

                               Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
                     1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai,
                     "D" Bench, dated 25.05.2009 in W.T.A.No.30/Mds/2008.
                               For Appellant        : Mr.M.Swaminathan,
                                                      Senior Standing Counsel
                               For Respondent       : Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar
                                                      JUDGMENT

(Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.) Challenging the order passed in W.T.A.No.30/Mds/2008 for the

assessment year 2004-05 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate

Tribunal, Chennai "D" Bench, the Department has filed the above appeal.

2.By order dated 25.05.2009, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Page 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

finding that the appeal fell within the monetary limit prescribed by the

CBDT, dismissed the appeal following the Board's Circular.

3.The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question

of law:

“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,

the Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal filed by

revenue based on low tax effect when the CBDT instructions

have specifically excluded cases where there has been an

audit objection from the minimum tax effect?”

4.Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned senior standing counsel appearing

for the appellant submitted that there was audit objection in the case of

the assessee and that the audit objection was also accepted and in such

case, the order passed by the Tribunal dismissing the appeal stating that

the appeal fell within the monetary limit, should be set aside and the

matter should be remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.

Page 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

5.Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent – assessee submitted that the stand now taken by the

Department in this appeal was not taken before the Income Tax

Appellate Tribunal and that the representative of the Department did not

produce any supportive documents before the Tribunal to establish that

that there was audit objection.

6.It is pertinent to note that even in the grounds of appeal, the

Department has raised it as a ground stating that there was audit

objection and the same is exempted as per the Board's instruction

No.2/2005 dated 24.10.2005 and as such the tax effect being below Rs.2

lakhs would not be a bar to filing of appeal.

7.The learned senior standing counsel appearing for the

Department submitted that since the Tribunal has not gone into the merits

of the matter, it would be appropriate to remit the matter back to the

Tribunal for fresh consideration.

8.Since the case of the assessee, though fell within the monetary

Page 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

limit prescribed by the CBDT, since it also fell within the exceptions

carved out in the Board's Circular dated 24.10.2005, we are of the

considered view that the order passed by the Tribunal should be set aside

and the matter should be remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh

consideration. Accordingly, the order dated 25.05.2009 passed by the

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is set aside and the matter is remitted

back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The respondent – assessee is

at liberty to raise all the defences available to him before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal is directed to decide the matter afresh, after giving

opportunity of hearing to both sides.

9.With these observations, the Tax Case Appeal is allowed. No

costs.




                                                                 [M.D., J.]   [T.V.T.S., J.]
                     Index : Yes/No                                     24.02.2021
                     Internet : Yes
                     va




                     Page 4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

To

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "D" Bench

Page 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

M.DURAISWAMY, J.

and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

va

T.C.A.No.207 of 2012

24.02.2021

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter