Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4749 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
Smt.Ananthi Rabindran
3/6, 13th Avenue,
Harrington Road, Chetpet,
Chennai – 600 031. ... Appellant
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer,
Non Corporate Ward – 3(1)
Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
"D" Bench, dated 22.12.2016 passed in I.T.A.No.1426/Mds/2015.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Kaushik
for Mr.S.Sridhar
For Respondent : Mr.M.Swaminathan
Senior Standing Counsel
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Page 1/5
Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.)
This appeal filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), is directed against the order
dated 22.12.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
"D" Bench, ('the Tribunal' for brevity) in I.T.A.No.1427/Mds/2015 for the
assessment year 2008-2009. The appeal was admitted on 30.01.2018 on
the following substantial question of law :
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in law in artificially imposing the condition of the availability of source for irrigation, despite the classification of the capital asset as agricultural lands in the revenue records, before testing the correctness of the claim of the assessee to tax exemption for the surplus generated from the sale of the said agricultural lands under Section 45 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Section 2(14)(iii) of the said Act?”
2. We have heard Mr.M.Kaushik for Mr.S.Sridhar, learned counsel
for the appellant/ assessee and Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior
Standing Counsel for the respondent/Revenue.
3. It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the Substantial
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 2/5 Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
Question of Law framed for consideration on account of certain
subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for
resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or
incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the
President on 17th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on
17th March 2020.
4. We are informed by the learned counsel for the appellant/
assessee that the assessee had already been issued with Form-3 on
22.12.2020 and the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw the appeal.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the
appellant/assessee, the Tax Case Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
[M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
23.02.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 3/5 Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
mkn
To
1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "D" Bench
2.The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward – 3(1) Chennai – 600 034.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 4/5 Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
mkn
Tax Case Appeal No.781 of 2017
23.02.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 5/5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!