Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

General Manager vs Kanthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 4431 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4431 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021

Madras High Court
General Manager vs Kanthan on 19 February, 2021
                                                                            C.M.P.(MD).No.9746 of 2018


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 19.02.2021

                                                      CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
                                         C.M.P(MD)No.9746 of 2018
                                       in C.M.A(MD).SR.No.38853 of 2018


                      General Manager
                      National Insurance Co.,Ltd.,
                      Divisional Office
                      Jerome Building 1st Floor
                      Kottai Station Road
                      Tiruchirapalli District                     ... Petitioner/Appellant
                                                         Vs.

                      1.Kanthan
                      2.Pottiammal
                      3.Sudhakar                                ....Respondents/Respondents

                      Prayer in C.M.P(MD).No.9746 of 2018 : This petition is filed under
                      Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to condone the delay of
                      428 days in filing the above appeal.


                      Prayer in C.M.A(MD).SR.No.38853 of 2018: This Civil Miscellaneous
                      Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set
                      aside the Judgment and Decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims
                      Tribunal Cum Special District Judge (MCOP) Tiruchirappalli, made in
                      M.C.O.P.No.4883 of 2013, dated 15.02.2017 and allow this appeal with
                      costs.


http://www.judis.nic.in
                      1/5
                                                                             C.M.P.(MD).No.9746 of 2018




                                  For Petitioner      : Mr.R.Rajamani
                                  For R1              : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj


                                                       ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the

delay of 428 days in filing the above appeal.

2.As regards the delay, the learned counsel for the petitioner would

state that after receiving the order copy, it was served to the Divisional

Officer, Tiruchirappalli. The lower court advocate has given opinion to

prefer an appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal. Hence, the file

was forwarded to our Regional Office at Madurai and thereafter, the file

was sent to High Court Panel Advocate to get second opinion for

preferring appeal. After that, the file was placed before the appeal

committee for approval and it was approved for preparing appeal. Due to

the above reason, there was a delay of 428 days in filing the appeal. The

above delay occurred which is neither wilful nor wanton and the

petitioner Insurance Company has good grounds on merits. Thus, he

would pray to condone the delay.

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.M.P.(MD).No.9746 of 2018

3.In State of Bihar vs. Deo Kumar Singh (SLP(Civil)No.

13348/2019 dated 09.05.2019, the appeal was filed with the delay of 728

days stating that the delay occurred in obtaining all the sanctions from

the respective departments and also in receiving the affidavit and

vakalathnama from the concerned department. The Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the said case, has held that a clear signal has to sent to the

Government Authorities that they cannot approach the Court as and

when they please on account of gross incompetence of their officers and

that too without taking any action against the concerned officers.

Ultimately, in the said case, the Apex Court while declining to condone

the delay of 728 days in filing the appeal, imposed the cost of Rs.

20,000/- to be recovered from the officers responsible for that delay and

be deposited to the Mediation Centre of the Supreme Court within four

weeks.

4.In the present case also, the delay is stated to have been occurred

due to administrative reason for filing the appeal. In view of the above

judgment of the Apex Court, such kind of reasons cannot be termed as

sufficient reasons to condone the delay. Therefore, this Court is not

inclined to condone the delay of 428 days in filing the appeal.

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.M.P.(MD).No.9746 of 2018

5.Accordingly, CMP(MD)No.9746 of 2018 is dismissed. No

costs. Consequently, CMA(MD)SR.No.38853 of 2018 is rejected.

19.02.2021

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No msa Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Cum Special District Judge (MCOP) Tiruchirappalli,

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.M.P.(MD).No.9746 of 2018

J.NISHA BANU,J

msa

C.M.P(MD)No.9746 of 2018 in C.M.A(MD).SR.No.38853 of 2018

19.02.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter