Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Additional Director Of Survey ... vs K.Sankaran
2021 Latest Caselaw 2158 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2158 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Madras High Court
The Additional Director Of Survey ... vs K.Sankaran on 1 February, 2021
                                                                             W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021


                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 01.02.2021
                                                     CORAM:
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
                                                       AND
                               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                             W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021

                      1.The Additional Director of Survey & Land Records,
                        Survey & Land Records Department
                        Chepauk, Chennai.

                      2.The Regional Deputy Director,
                        Survey & Land Records Department
                        Madurai, Madurai District.

                      3.The Assistant Director,
                        Survey and Land Records Department
                        Tirunelveli
                        Tirunelveli District.                               :Appellants
                                                        Vs.
                      K.Sankaran                                            : Respondent

                      PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
                      order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.15129/2015 dated 24.01.2020




                      1/6


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                 W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021




                                   For Appellants           : Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi
                                                            Special Government Pleader

                                   For Respondent           : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan for
                                                            M/s.Ajmal Associates

                                                      JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

This appeal is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge,

who, upon perusing the records, found that due procedure has not been

followed, apart from the punishment being grossly disproportionate.

2.The respondent was issued with a set of charges by the disciplinary

authority. On a perusal of the charges, they are directly against the said

authority, insofar as the violation attributed against the respondent is

concerned. However, not only the charges, but even the final order of

punishment, upon considering the enquiry report, was passed by the same

person. The appeal filed was dismissed.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021

3.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

appellants submitted that the Rules governing namely, Rule 8(5) and Rule

12 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955

provide for such a punishment. The learned Single Judge order, thus,

requires interference.

4.The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted

that the charges are mainly against insubordination to the disciplinary

authority, who framed them. He then acted as a disciplinary authority.

Therefore, the respondent rightly did not participate in the enquiry. One of

the charge was the subject matter of the earlier proceedings, in which,

withholding of increment was ordered. This was again quoted in the present

charge memo. In fact, the disciplinary authority relieved the respondent.

Curiously a charge has been framed for not getting relieved. Therefore, not

only non application of mind, but also there is no fairness in the enquiry

conducted.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021

5.We are inclined to concur with the submissions made by the learned

Senior counsel for the respondent and thus, the finding rendered by the

learned Single Judge does not warrant interference. In a departmental

enquiry, fairness in action is indispensable. Not only the disciplinary

authority, but the appellate authority can also exercise the power. However,

when the charges framed against the delinquent officer or against the

insubordination shown to a particular individual superior officer, he cannot

act as a disciplinary authority, though there may not be a bar in framing the

charges. Enquiry conducted in pursuant to the charges framed is a piece of

evidence to be appreciated by the disciplinary authority. When the

disciplinary authority himself is a person, against whom, a delinquent

officer is stated to have involved in insubordination, he cannot wear two

caps and act in twin capacity. Therefore, the very passing of the order

imposing punishment against the respondent cannot be sustained in the eye

of law.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021

6.Thus, we do not find any error in the ultimate conclusion arrived at

by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No

costs.



                                                                    [M.M.S., J.] & [S.A.I, J.]
                                                                        01.02.2021
                      Index          : Yes/No
                      Internet       : Yes

                      RR







http://www.judis.nic.in
                                  W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021


                                M.M.SUNDRESH, J
                                                 AND
                                    S.ANANTHI, J

                                                    RR




                                      Order made in
                            W.A.(MD)No.184 of 2021




                                          01.02.2021







http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter