Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Dhanalakshmi vs The Inspector General Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 25228 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 25228 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2021

Madras High Court
S.Dhanalakshmi vs The Inspector General Of ... on 22 December, 2021
                                                                                W.P.No.22323 of 2021



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 22.12.2021

                                                      CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                               W.P.No.22323 of 2021
                                            and W.M.P.No.23555 of 2021


                     S.Dhanalakshmi                                             ... Petitioner

                                                        -Vs-

                     1. The Inspector General of Registration (I.G.R),
                        Santhome High Road, Mylapore,
                        Chennai - 600 002.

                     2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration (D.I.G),
                        Vellore, Vellore-"District",

                     3. The District Registrar (D.R),
                        The Office of the District Registrar,
                        Cheyyar Registration District,
                        Cheyyar, Tirivannamalai- "District".

                     4. The Sub-Registrar,
                        The Office of the Registrar,
                        Arani, Tiruvannamalai- "District".

                     5. The Tashildar,
                        Arani Taluk,
                        Tiruvannamalai-"District".                              ... Respondents


                     Page 1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.No.22323 of 2021


                     Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
                     fourth respondent herein to "Register" the properties in S.No.178/1 to an
                     extent of 1 Acres and 0.05 cents and in S.No.177/3 to an extent of 2
                     Acres and 0.97 cents in toto to an extent of 4 Acres and 0.02 cents,
                     situated in Vadugasathu- "Village", Arani- "Taluk", Tiruvannamalai-
                     "District" on the name of petitioner herein as per the guide line value of
                     the property prevailing in the year 2008 which is the subject matter in
                     E.P.No.2 of 2010 in O.S.No.38 of 2008 on the file of Hon'ble Sub Court,
                     Arani, Tiruvannamalai-"District".


                                         For Petitioner     : Mr.A.Vimal Raj
                                         For R1 to R4       : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan
                                                              Special Government Pleader
                                         For R5             : Mr.P.Baladhandayutham
                                                              Special Government Pleader


                                                      ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of

Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent herein to "Register" the

properties in S.No.178/1 to an extent of 1 Acres and 0.05 cents and in

S.No.177/3 to an extent of 2 Acres and 0.97 cents in toto to an extent of

4 Acres and 0.02 cents, situated in Vadugasathu- "Village", Arani-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22323 of 2021

"Taluk", Tiruvannamalai- "District" on the name of petitioner herein as

per the guide line value of the property prevailing in the year 2008 which

is the subject matter in E.P.No.2 of 2010 in O.S.No.38 of 2008 on the file

of Hon'ble Sub Court, Arani, Tiruvannamalai-"District".

2. Heard Mr.A.Vimal Raj, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, learned Special Government Pleader

appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.P.Baladhandayutham,

learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the fifth respondent.

3. The petitioner entered into an agreement for sale with

P.Venkatesan and P.Mani to purchase the property comprised in Survey

No.178/1 to an extent of 1 acre 0.05 cents and the property comprised in

Survey No.177/3 to an extent of 2 acres 0.99 cents by the agreement,

dated 22.02.2008. However, the petitioner's vendor had not come

forward to execute the sale deed and as such the petitioner was

constrained to file a suit for specific performance in O.S.No.38 of 2008

on the file of the Sub Court, Arani, Tiruvannamalai District. Thereafter,

the suit was decreed by the Judgment and Decree, dated 25.06.2009. In

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22323 of 2021

pursuant to the decree, the petitioner filed an execution petition in

E.P.No.02 of 2010 to get registration of the properties. When the

petitioner is always ready and willing to pay the registration fees along

with requisite stamp duty in accordance with the guideline value of the

properties in the year 2008. The fourth respondent was not inclined to

register the same.

4. In spite of the letter issued by the learned Sub Judge, Arani,

dated 22.11.2013, the fourth respondent did not consider the same and

by a letter dated 25.11.2013 informed to the learned Sub Judge, Arani,

since the subject properties are house plots, the value of the subject land

could be at Rs.70/- per sq.ft. Accordingly, the value of the property had

been fixed at Rs.1,22,98,365/-, the stamp duty at the rate of 7% at

Rs.8,60,888/- and the registration fees at Rs.1,23,165/-. A perusal of the

guideline value for the subject land is mentioned as agriculture and fixed

rate at Rs.15,800/- per acre. However, no sale deed was presented was

registration.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22323 of 2021

5. Considering the above, the petitioner is directed to present

the sale deed for registration before the fourth respondent and on receipt

of the same the fourth respondent is directed to consider the above

observations and pass order either to register the same or to reject the

same.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be

no order as to costs.

22.12.2021

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order mn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22323 of 2021

To

1. The Inspector General of Registration (I.G.R), Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration (D.I.G), Vellore, Vellore-"District",

3. The District Registrar (D.R), The Office of the District Registrar, Cheyyar Registration District, Cheyyar, Tirivannamalai- "District".

4. The Sub-Registrar, The Office of the Registrar, Arani, Tiruvannamalai- "District".

5. The Tashildar, Arani Taluk, Tiruvannamalai-"District".

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22323 of 2021

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

W.P.No.22323 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.23555 of 2021

22.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter