Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Kannan vs R.Edwin Joshua
2021 Latest Caselaw 25060 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 25060 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2021

Madras High Court
S.Kannan vs R.Edwin Joshua on 20 December, 2021
                                                                             Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14742 of 2021


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED : 20.12.2021

                                                        CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                            Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14742 of 2021
                                                        and
                                        Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.7814 & 7815 of 2021

                S.kannan                                                    ... Petitioner/
                                                                                Accused

                                                          Vs.

                R.Edwin Joshua                                              ... Respondent/
                                                                                Complainant

                Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call
                for records pertaining to S.T.C.No.113 of 2021 pending on the file of the
                learned Judicial Magistrate F.T.C.No.II, Madurai and quash the same.
                                  For Petitioner    : Mr.D.Selvanayagam

                                  For Respondent : Mrs.A.S.Shangeetha

                                                         ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned

counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioner is facing a trial in S.T.C.No.113 of 2021 on the file of

learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court) No.II, Madurai. It is a private

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14742 of 2021

complaint instituted by the respondent for the offence under Section 138 of

Negotiable Instrument Act.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterated all the

contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds.

4. While considering the quash petition, it may not be open to this Court

to go into those factual aspects. The petitioner has to necessarily prove his

innocence only before the Court below. The learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner relied on the order dated 02.03.2021 made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1907

of 2021. A learned Judge of this Court had directed the complainant to produce

the Income Tax returns for the relevant period. I note that the said order was

not passed in a quash petition. When a Memo was filed by the accused to

direct the complainant to produce the salary slip issued for every month and

also Income Tax returns, the trial Court allowed the memo by passing an order

to that effect and directed the complainant to produce the documents.

Challenging the said order, that Criminal Original Petition was filed before this

Court. In that proceedings, the order mentioned by the petitioner's counsel was

passed. Therefore, the said decision has no direct application to the case on

hand. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. The

petitioner's remedies and rights are left open.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14742 of 2021

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the

personal appearance of the petitioner before the Court below shall stand

dispensed with. The Court below will insist on the personal appearance of the

petitioner only on three occasions namely, to answer the charges, examination

under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., and at the time of pronouncing Judgment. On all

other occasions, the petitioner need not appear before the Court below.

However, on those occasions, the petitioner will have to be represented by his

counsel. If the petitioner's counsel is also absent, the benefit of dispensing the

personal appearance of the petitioner will stand automatically vacated.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.



                                                                                  20.12.2021

                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes/ No
                mga

Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.Judicial Magistrate F.T.C.No.II, Madurai.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14742 of 2021

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

mga

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14742 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.7814 & 7815 of 2021

20.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter