Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Management vs The Presiding Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 24793 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24793 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2021

Madras High Court
The Management vs The Presiding Officer on 16 December, 2021
                                                                                        W.A.(MD) No.469 of 2019


                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                        DATED: 16.12.2021
                                                             CORAM:
                          THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                 AND
                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                                W.A.(MD) No.469 of 2019
                                        and C.M.P.(MD) Nos.3998 and 8269 of 2019

                     The Management,
                     Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.,
                     Dalmiapuram, Lalgudi Taluk,
                     Trichy District.                                      ... Appellant/Petitioner

                                                            Vs.

                     1.The Presiding Officer,
                       Labour Court,
                       Tiruchirapalli.
                     2.R.Ramadurai                                         ... Respondents/Respondents


                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to
                     set aside the order, dated 04.06.2018, made in W.P.(MD) No.1604 of
                     2014 by allowing the appeal.


                                       For Petitioner             : Ms.P.Malini

                                       For Respondent             : Mr.P.Balasubramanian


                                                         JUDGEMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.)

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 26.11.2021, it was

stated that the matter would be settled and therefore, the matter is

posted today (16.12.2021) under the caption “for reporting settlement”. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1/4 W.A.(MD) No.469 of 2019

2.Today, a Joint Memo of Compromise was filed, signed by the

General Manager-HR, on behalf of the appellant company, and the

second respondent. The second respondent is also present before this

Court.

3.The terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise reads as follows:

1. The 2nd Respondent, Mr. R. Ramadurai, S/o. Rengarajan has agreed to withdraw all legal proceedings against the Appellant Management, including I.D. No.76/2008 and shall not press for any relief in terms of the award passed in the said Dispute or in terms of the Order of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. (MD) No.1604/2014.

2. The 2nd Respondent Mr. R. Ramadurai accepts the cessation of his employment from the service of the Appellant Management w.e.f. 27.05.2006 and that he shall not be entitled to any statutory or contractual monetary dues, apart from what is provided below:- a. The Management, taking into consideration of the period of service rendered by the 2nd Respondent Mr. R. Ramadurai, and in order to give a quietus to the long pending litigation, agrees to pay him a lumpsum amount of Rs.23,00,000/- (Rupees twenty-three lakhs only). All applicable taxes to be borne by Mr. Ramadurai will be paid on his behalf to the authority and the rest would be paid from the lumpsum.

b. This amount shall be paid by the Management https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2/4 W.A.(MD) No.469 of 2019

on Mr. R. Ramadurai withdrawing all the disputes.

3. It is agreed by both the parties that, on payment of the above amount to Mr.R.Ramadurai, both the parties will sign a settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

4. It is also agreed that both the parties will file a copy of this Memo before the Hon'ble High Court and shall seek disposal of the Pending Writ Appeal in terms of this joint memo of compromise, and in substitution of the award passed by the Labour Court in I.D. No. 76/2008.”

The terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise is recorded.

4.The Writ Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo of

Compromise. The Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of this

judgment. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition are

closed.

                                                                       [P.S.N.,J]    [P.V.,J.]
                                                                             16.12.2021
                     Index             :Yes/No
                     Internet          :Yes/No
                     sj

                     Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3/4 W.A.(MD) No.469 of 2019

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and P.VELMURUGAN, J.

sj

To

1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Tiruchirapalli.

W.A.(MD) No.469 of 2019

16.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4/4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter