Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Reliance General Insurance ... vs Banupriya
2021 Latest Caselaw 24675 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24675 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021

Madras High Court
The Reliance General Insurance ... vs Banupriya on 15 December, 2021
                                                               C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 15.12.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                               and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                       C.M.A.Nos.1407of 2020 and 796 of 2021
                                                       and
                                             C.M.P.No.10308 of 2020

                 C.M.A.No.1407 of 2020

                 The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited,
                 4th Floor, No.6, Haddows Road,
                 Chennai – 600 006.                                              ... Appellant

                                                        Vs.

                 1.Banupriya
                 2.Minor Haripriya
                 3.Minor Kishore Kumar
                 4.Jothi
                 (Minors 2 & 3 are represented by
                  mother and NF, 1st respondent)

5.Ganesan

6.S.Bhaskar ... Respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Judgment and Decree made in MCOP No.2410 of 2017 dated 26.11.2019, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

                                  For Appellant     :    Mr.M.B.Raghavan for
                                                         M/s M.B.Gopalan Associates

                                  For Respondents   :    Mr.K.Varadhakamaraj
                                                         (for R1 to R5)



                 C.M.A.No.796 of 2021

                 1.Banupriya
                 2.Minor Haripriya
                 3.Minor Kishore Kumar
                 4.Jothi
                 5.Ganesan
                 (Minors 2 & 3 are rep. by next friend
                  and natural guardian, their mother)                              ... Appellants

                                                          Vs.

                 1.S.Bhaskar

2.The Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., No.6, 4th Floor, Haddows Road, Chennai – 600 006.

... Respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the decree and judgment dated 26.11.2019 made in MCOP No.2410 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

                                  For Appellants    :    Mr.K.Varadha Kamaraj

                                  For Respondents    :   Mr.M.B.Raghavan
                                                         M/s M.B.Gopalan Associates



                                               COMMON JUDGMENT


[Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.]

CMA No.796 of 2021 is filed by the claimants being dissatisfied with the

award of the Tribunal passed in MCOP No.2410 of 2017 dated 26.11.2019. CMA

No.1407 of 2020 has been preferred by the Insurance Company assailing the

award passed in the same MCOP.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

2.The facts of the case in nutshell:-

On 05.02.2017 at 20.00 hours, when the deceased Naresh @ Naresan was

crossing the road from east to west at Kannagi Nagar – 200 feet road Junction,

Kolathur, Chennai, a For Registration Bajaj Pulzar Ebony Black colour

motorcycle bearing Engine No.DKZCGG58273, Chasis

No.MD2A13EZ8GCG41543 came in a high speed and hit against the deceased.

In the impact, the deceased sustained fatal injuries and died in the hospital on

06.02.2017. The wife, children and the parents of the deceased filed the claim

petition before the Tribunal. Though they claimed Rs.30,00,000/- as

compensation, the Tribunal has awarded Rs.23,52,000/- together with interest at

7.5% per annum, under the following heads:-

                                                 Heads                          Rs.
                            Loss of dependency 10000+4000=14000-             21,42,000/-
                            1/4(3500)=10500x12x17
                            Loss of Consortium                                  40,000/-
                            Towards Loss of Love and Affection                1,30,000/-
                            Transport Expenditure                               10,000/-
                            Loss of Estate and Funeral                          30,000/-
                            Total                                            23,52,000/-



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                  C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

Further, the Tribunal observed that the Insurance Company has to pay

compensation to the claimants and thereafter, recover the same from the owner of

the vehicle. Challenging the said award, the Insurance Company has filed an

appeal on the ground that the award is on the higher side and the claimants

preferred an appeal to enhance the compensation as stated supra.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has contended

that the Tribunal erred in holding that the appellant Insurance Company is liable

in a case where the motorcycle was allowed to be driven by a minor in brazen

violation of Motor Vehicles Act and the policy of insurance by the owner. The

Tribunal ought to have exonerated the Insurance Company and directed the owner

of the motorcycle alone to pay compensation. He would further contend that the

Tribunal has erred in fixing the income at Rs.10,000/- per month and adding

future prospects and fixing high amount of dependency without any reliable or

acceptable evidence.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

4.The learned counsel appearing for the claimants would contend that since

the amount awarded by the Tribunal is meager in all the heads, the claimants are

entitled for higher compensation. He would further contend that the Tribunal

erred in fixing the income of the deceased as Rs.10,000/- per month as against the

claim of Rs.700/- per day. The Tribunal ought to have fixed income of the

deceased is Rs.700/- per day as per the oral evidence of P.W.1 and prevailing

economic condition on the date of accident. Hence, the claimants seek for

enhancement of compensation.

5.This Court carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the

materials available on record.

6.In the instant case, the claimants have proved that the deceased was

earning Rs.13,000/- per month, but the Tribunal, without considering the same,

has fixed notional monthly income of the deceased as Rs.10,000/-. Therefore,

this Court considering the age of the deceased, fixes the monthly income as

Rs.13,000/-. Further, the claimants are entitled to 40% future prospects and after

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

deducting 1/4th for personal expenses and by applying multiplier '17', this Court

awards Rs.27,84,600/- (13000+5,200=18200-4550(1/4)=13650x12x17) towards

loss of dependency. In addition, as per the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in

the case of Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Nanu Ram and others

reported in 2018(1) TN MAC 452 (SC), the claimants are entitled to Rs.40,000/-

each towards consortium, which comes to Rs.2,00,000/-. Rs.15,000/- is awarded

for loss of estate. Rs.15,000/- is awarded for funeral expenses. Hence, the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the appellants is re-quantified as

follows:-

                                                  Heads                    Rs.
                             Loss of dependency                         27,84,600/-
                             Loss of consortium                          2,00,000/-
                             Funeral expenses                              15,000/-
                             Loss of Estate                                15,000/-
                             Total                                      30,14,600/-
                             Rounded Off                                30,14,000/-


7.Though the learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has

contended that the Tribunal has erroneously ordered pay and recovery and it has

to be set aside, on perusal of the records, we find that the Tribunal, on proper

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

appreciation of evidence of R.W.1 and Ex.R.2-Insurance Policy, has ordered pay

and recovery and therefore, the same is confirmed. The rate of interest fixed by

the Tribunal as 7.5% per annum is also confirmed. In view of the modification of

the award amount, the amount of Rs.10,000/- awarded under the head of

Transport Expenditure is set aside.

8.In such view of the matter, CMA No.796 of 2021 is partly allowed and

CMA No.1407 of 2020 is dismissed. The Insurance Company is directed to

deposit the modified award amount with accrued interest and costs, less the

amount already deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order at the first instance and thereafter, recover the same

from the insured. On such deposit, the major claimants are permitted to withdraw

the award amount as apportioned by the Tribunal, less the amount already

withdrawn, if any, together with proportionate interest and costs. Further, the

Tribunal is directed to deposit the share of the minor claimants in any one of the

nationalised banks, as fixed deposit under the Cumulative Deposit Scheme, till

the minors attain the age of major and and the first claimant, who is the guardian

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

of the minor claimants, is permitted to withdraw interest once in six months

directly from the bank. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.

                                                              [M.K.K.S.,J.]            [V.S.G.,J.]
                                                                       15.12.2021

                 Intex            : Yes/No
                 Internet         : Yes/No
                 skn


                 To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

2.V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.1407 of 2020 & 796 of 2021

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

skn

C.M.A.Nos.1407of 2020 and 796 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.10308 of 2020

15.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter