Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24612 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021
T.C.A.No.652 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No.652 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income tax
Chennai ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Ramsahaimal Sanhuwala & Sons,
Charitable Trust No.24,
Cathedral Garden Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai - 600 034.
... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench Chennai,
dated 01.02.2008 in I.TA.No.1383/Mds/2007.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy
For Respondent : Mr.N.Muthukumar
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.No.652 of 2009
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue, challenging
the order dated 01.02.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai 'B' Bench, in I.T.A.No.1383/Mds/2007, relating to the assessment year
1998-99.
2.By order dated 18.08.2009, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial question of law:
“ Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the income earned from running of Kalyana Mandapam is not a business income and that assessee was eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for
the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the Department
before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.652 of 2009
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4.In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for
the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to be
less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open
the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 14.12.2021 av
Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench Chennai,
2. The Commissioner of Income tax Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.652 of 2009
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
av
T.C.A.No.652 of 2009
14.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!