Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.K.N.Higher Secondary School
2021 Latest Caselaw 23929 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23929 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021

Madras High Court
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.K.N.Higher Secondary School on 6 December, 2021
                                                        1

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED: 06.12.2021

                                                   CORAM:

                     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                          AND
                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                       W.A(MD)NO.1037 OF 2021
                                                 and
                                       C.M.P(MD)No.4632 of 2021


                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                       represented by its Principal Secretary to Government,
                       School Education Department,
                       Secretariat, Fort St.George,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Director of School Education,
                       DPI Campus, College Road,
                       Chennai.

                     3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Madurai,
                       Madurai District.

                     4.The District Educational Officer,
                       Usilampatti,
                       Madurai District.           :Appellants/Respondents 1 to 4

                                            .vs.

                     P.K.N.Higher Secondary School,
                     represented by its Secretary,
                     Mr.P.A.Sakthivel,
                     No.104, Madurai Road,
                     Thirumangalam,
                     Madurai District.             : Respondent/Petitioner

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                     praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                2

                     W.P(MD)No.24304 of 2015, dated 26.11.2019.


                                       For Appellants               :Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandhran
                                                                     Addl.Govt.Pleader

                                       For Respondent               :Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan


                                                     JUDGMENT

************* [Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.]

This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned

Single Judge made in W.P(MD)No.24304 of 2015, dated

26.11.2019.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.The above Writ Appeal is filed by the Government

challenging the appointment of a Gardener in the

respondent/School. Admittedly, the respondent-School is a

recognised Government aided private school. The said school has

the sanctioned post of non-teaching staff namely, Gardner. The

incumbent Garnder retired on 31.03.2018,on attaining the age of

superannuation and in the said vacancy which fell vacant on

31.3.2018, one J.Thangarajan was appointed on 30.05.2018. When

the proposal was sent on the same day to the second respondent

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

for approval, it was rejected by the fourth appellant on the ground

that as per G.O.Ms.No.64, School Education Department, dated

3.4.2018, permission cannot be granted for non-teaching staffs.

The Writ Petition was filed challenging the said order of rejection,

which was allowed by the Writ Court. The said order is now under

challenge before this Court.

4.The learned Additional Government Pleader placed his

reliance on G.O.Ms.No.64, School Education Department, dated

3.4.2018 and Clause4(5) of the said Government Order states as

follows:

“Ehyfh;. Ehyf cjtpahsh;. njhl;lf;fhuh; kw;Wk; ePh; bfhzh;gth; nghd;w gzpapl';fs; muR gs;spfSf;nf xg;g[jyspf;fg;glhj epiyapy.; MuR epjpa[jtp bgWk; gs;spfspYs;s nkw;fz;l gzpapl';fis jpUk;g vLj;Jf; bfhz;L mg;gzpapl';fspy; jw;nghJ gzpg[hpgth;fs; Xa;t[ bgw;w gpdd; h; my;yJ gjtp cah;t[ bgw;w gpdd ; h;. mg;gzpapl';fs; fhypahFk;gl;rj;jpy; mg;gzpapl';fSf;F tH';fg;gl;l xg;g[jy; jpUkgg; bgwntz;Lk; vd;Wk;. Xg;g[jy;

mspf;fg;gl;l ,g;gzpapl';fis jpUk;gg; bgWtJ rhh;e;J. gs;spapd; bgah;. gjtp Mfpatw;wiw Fwpg;gpl;L mg;gzpapl';fspy; jw;nghJ gzpg[hpgth; Xa;t[ bgw;w gpdd ; h; my;yJ gjtp cah;t[ bgw;w gpdd ; h; fhypahFk;gl;rj;jpy; ,g;gzpapl';fspd; xg;gspg;gpidjpUk;gg; bgwt[k;. gzpapl';fspypy; gzpg[hpgth;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Xa;t[ bgw;w ehs; Kjy; ,jid eilKiwg;gLj;j ntz;Lk;/ ,jw;bfd murstpy; Miz btspapl ntz;o jf;f fUj;JUtpid muRf;F mDg;gp itf;FkhWk; gs;spf; fy;tp ,af;FeUf;F mwpt[Wj;jg;gLfpwJ/”

5.As per the above said cluase, whenever the approved post

of non-teaching staff became vacant, the said post with the other

details like name of the school etc., should be mentioned and the

same should be surrendered and there should be a Government

order issued in this regard. The above said caluse had made such

recommendation to the Director of School Education. The learned

Additional Government Pleader only relied on the condition that

ifthe incumbent retired and the vacancy arose on 31.03.2018,

the school will surrender the post of Gardener, which is a non

teaching staff. But a close reading of the above said Government

Order states that the said recommendation has to be issued by way

of Government Order, to bring it to operation.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants is unable

to state whether any such Government Order has been issued so

far. Therefore, the only objection that has been raised is the

surrendering of post on the date when it fell vacant, does not

survive for consideration. .

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7.The learned counsel for the respondent would state that the

school is having more than 1000 students and there is only one

Garnder to maintain the Garden. In fact, the learned Single Judge

also has found that the said clause is discriminatory with the

similarly placed persons were approved by the Department.

8.In the light of the above discussions and in the absence of

Government Order pursuant to the above referred Government

Order in G.O.Ms.No.64, School Education Department, dated

3.4.2018 specifically directing the schools to surrender the post as

and when the vacancy arises in future and other retirement or

promotion. The argument of the appellant cannot be accepted.

Hence the Writ Appeal is dismissed.The respondents 3 and 4 are

directed to consider the proposal made by the Writ Petitioner

School and approve the appointment of J.Thangarajan as Gardner,

if it is otherwise in order, within a period of four weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order and report compliance. No

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

9.Post the matter under the caption ''for reporting

compliance'' on 19.01.2022.

                                                                     [P.S.N.,J.]     [P.V.,J.]
                                                                              06.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                     Index:Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No
                     vsn

                     Note :

                     In view of the present lock
                     down owing to COVID-19
                     pandemic, a web copy of
                     the order may be utilized
                     for official purposes, but,
                     ensuring that the copy of
                     the order that is presented
                     is the correct copy, shall
                     be the responsibility of the
                     advocate       /     litigant
                     concerned.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                                  PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
                                                          AND
                                             P.VELMURUGAN, J.


                                                           vsn




                                           JUDGMENT MADE IN
                                       W.A(MD)NO.1037 OF 2021
                                                           and
                                      C.M.P(MD)No.4632 of 2021




                                                    06.12.2021



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter