Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Gnana Sudha ...1St
2021 Latest Caselaw 23512 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23512 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Gnana Sudha ...1St on 1 December, 2021
                                                                             C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 01.12.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                           C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019
                                                     and
                                           C.M.P.(MD)No.4859 of 2019

                  The Managing Director,
                  Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Ltd.,
                  Nagercoil.                                   ...Appellant/2nd Respondent

                                                         Vs.

                  1.Gnana Sudha                                ...1st Respondent/Petitioner
                  2.Devaraj
                  3.The Branch Manager,
                    United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
                    Xavier Building, II Floor,
                    PWD Road, Nagercoil                        ...2nd & 3rd Respondents /
                                                                              1 & 3 Respondents

                  PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of the
                  Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the award and decree made in
                  M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2009, dated 10.09.2012 on the file of the Motor Accident
                  Claims Tribunal/Sub Court, Kuzhithurai.


                                       For Appellant     :Mr.P.Prabhakaran
                                       For R1 & R2       :No Appearance
                                       For R3            :Mr.J.S.Murali



                 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019


                                                       JUDGMENT

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the award

and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2009, dated 10.09.2012 on the file of

the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Sub Court, Kuzhithurai.

2.It is a case of accident, which took place on 27.11.2007, the deceased

who was driving the Maruthi Zen Car, bearing Registration No.TN-74-

F-3364 from Kottaram to Nagercoil, while coming near Mantharam Puthur,

the bus bearing Registration No.TN-74-N-0441 came from opposite direction

in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the car. Due to the said

accident, three persons were died.

3.The claimants have filed a petitions M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2009, dated

27.03.2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Sub Court,

Kuzhithurai, seeking compensation.

4.The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidences and the arguments of the counsel for the claimants and the

respondents and also on appreciating the evidences on record, held that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019

accident occurred only, due to the rash and negligent driving of the bus and

directed the appellant herein to pay compensation. Against which, the

appellant/second respondent has filed these present appeals to set aside the

award of compensation passed by the Tribunal.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel

appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

6.According to the learned counsel for the appellant, two vehicles

came from the opposite direction and dashed with each other. So both the

vehicles are responsible for the accident. But the Tribunal has fixed liability

only on the appellant/Transport Corporation. The compensation awarded by

the Tribunal is excessive.

7.From the materials available on record, it is seen that F.I.R. was

registered against the driver of the bus and charge sheet has also been filed.

The driver of the bus was evicted by the trial Court. So no other evidence, to

fix the liability on the part of the driver of the Maruthi Zen Car. So in all

aspects, the Tribunal rightly fixed the liability on the driver of the bus.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019

8.The Tribunal, after considering all the facts, held that the accident

occurred only due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus

and rightly fixed liability on the appellant/Transport Corporation. There is no

error in the said finding. The monthly income fixed by the tribunal is also

reasonable and as far as quantum of compensation is concerned, the amount

awarded by the Tribunal is not excessive.

9.Considering all the materials on record in entirety, this court is of the

view that there is no error to interfere with the award of the Tribunal.

10.In the result,

(i)The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

(ii)The appellant /Tamilnadu Transport Corporation Ltd., is directed to

deposit the compensation awarded by the Tribunal together with interest at

the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of

deposit to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2009 on the file of the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal/Sub Court, Kuzhithurai within a period of six

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019

(iii)On such deposit being made, the claimants are entitled to withdraw

the same, by filing necessary application before the Tribunal. Consequently,

connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

                  Index :Yes/No                                                        01.12.2021
                  Internet:Yes/No
                  vsd



Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Sub Court, Kuzhithurai.

2. The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019

S.ANANTHI, J.

vsd

C.M.A.(MD).No.408 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.4859 of 2019

01.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter