Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Anjalai
2021 Latest Caselaw 17212 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17212 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Anjalai on 23 August, 2021
                                                                              C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 23.08.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                               C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016
                                                       and
                                               CMP No.14216 of 2016


                     The Managing Director,
                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
                     Villupuram Division III, Kancheepuram
                     Rep. by its Managing Director                               .... Appellant

                                                     Versus


                     1. Anjalai

                     2. Vedhachalam                                    ....      Respondents



                               Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2013
                     made in M.C.O.P No.41 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents
                     Claims Tribunal, The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu.



                     For Appellant                   : Mr. K.J. Sivakumar




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/6
                                                                            C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016



                                                       JUDGMENT

(Heard Video Conference)

This appeal has been filed by the Transport Corporation

challenging the impugned award, dated 30.01.2013 passed by Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu in

MCOP No.41 of 2011.

2. Heard Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, learned counsel for the appellant /

Transport Corporation. Since this Court is going to confirm the award of

the Tribunal, notice to the respondents is not necessary.

3. This Court has perused the materials and evidence available on

record before the Tribunal.

4. A person by name B. Manickam aged 23 years, died on

28.12.2010, as a result of an accident caused by a bus owned by the

appellant Transport Corporation. The deceased was a Mason at the time

of the accident. In the claim petition, the claimants, who are the parents

of the deceased have pleaded that the deceased was earning Rs.9,000/-

per month at the time of the accident. However, the Tribunal has assessed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016

the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.5,000/-. The accident

having happened in the year 2010, this Court is of the considered view

that the fixation of the notional monthly income of the deceased at

Rs.5,000/- cannot be considered to be excessive as alleged by the

Transport Corporation.

5. The Tribunal has also adopted the wrong multiplier of 13, by

taking into consideration, the age of the mother of the deceased which is

incorrect. The Tribunal ought to have taken into consideration the age

of the deceased who was 23 years at the time of the accident, for the

purpose of applying the multiplier. If the age of the deceased was taken

into consideration, the correct multiplier would have been 18.

6. The Tribunal has also failed to award any loss of future

prospects to the appellants / claimants even though they are legally

entitled to as per the settled law. Therefore, the overall compensation of

Rs.4,02,000/- awarded by the Tribunal cannot be considered to be

excessive as alleged by the appellant / Transport Corporation

7. For the foregoings reasons, this Court does not find any merit in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016

this appeal and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

8. The Appellant / Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the

entire award amount awarded by the Tribunal together with interest at

7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of realization, less

the amount, if any, already deposited to the credit of M.C.O.P No.41 of

2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, The Principal

District Court, Chengalpattu, within a period of eight weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made,

the Tribunal is directed to transfer the award amount directly to the bank

account of the respondents 1 and 2 / claimants through RTGS, within a

period of two weeks thereafter as per the ratio of apportionment fixed by

the Tribunal.

23.08.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

gd/vsi2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016

To

1. The Principal District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chengalpattu.

2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai – 104.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2

C.M.A.No.1953 of 2016

23.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter