Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17195 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021
C.S.No.398 of 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.398 of 2005
M/s.Sree Devi Video Corporation
rep. by its Partner
Ghanshyam Hemdev
No.73 Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai – 600 034. ...Plaintiff
.Vs.
1.A.N.Subbia, Proprietor
M/s.VIDEO PARK
No.3, Saravana Street
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.
2.M/s.Gemini Colour Laboratory
No.2 Vembuliamman Koil Street,
Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 092.
3.M/s.Vijaya Colour Laboratory
No.9-A, Kumaran Colony Main Road
Vadapalani, Chennai – 600 026.
4.M/s.Prasad Film Laboratories
No.58, Arunachalam Road,
Chennai – 600 093.
5.M/s.Tamilnadu Cine Laboratories
Page No.1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.S.No.398 of 2005
2, Kuppuswamy Street
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017
... Defendants
Plaint filed under Sections 55 and 62 of the Indian Copyright Act,
1957 read with Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules and Order VII
Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for a judgment and decree:
(a) For a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the
limited copyrights viz., entire copyrights in all Video formats including
but not restricted to Cable TV copyrights, VCD, DVD, LD, Multimedia
rights for entire India, in the schedule mentioned films as per agreement
dated 30.09.2002 for 15 years from the date of the agreement;
(b) For a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their
men, agents, servants or assigns from in any manner infringing the
limited copyrights viz., entire copyrights in all Video formats including
but not restricted to Cable TV copyrights, VCD, DVD, LD, Multimedia
rights for entire India, for a period of 15 years from 30.09.2002 and
(c) For costs of the suit.
For Plaintiff : Ms.Monica Chopra
for Mr.K.Harishankar
For Defendants : No appearance
********
JUDGMENT
Page No.2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.398 of 2005
Ms.Monica Chopra, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff
would submit that he has got instructions to withdraw the suit. A memo
to that effect has also been filed.
2. In view of the same, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
23.08.2021
dsa
Index : No
Internet : Yes
Non-speaking order
List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants : Nil
23.08.2021 dsa
Page No.3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.398 of 2005
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
C.S.No.398 of 2005
23.08.2021
Page No.4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!