Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Annamalai vs Arjunan
2021 Latest Caselaw 9818 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9818 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Annamalai vs Arjunan on 17 April, 2021
                                                                          C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED: 17.04.2021

                                                  CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                           C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019
                 1.Annamalai,
                   S/o.Kuppusami
                 2.Pappathi @ Palaniammal,
                   D/o.Late.Kuppusami                                      ... Appellants

                                                     Vs.
                 1.Arjunan,
                   S/o.Chinnamuthu gounder
                 2.The Branch Manager,
                   National Insurance Company Ltd.,
                   No.37/2E, Salem Main Road,
                   Mettur Dam RS, Salem District.                          ... Respondents

                       Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                 Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.08.2015
                 made in M.C.O.P.No.94 of 2008, on the file of the Motor Accidents
                 Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge Court, Mettur.
                             For Appellants    : Mr.S.P.Yuaraj
                             For Respondents :
                             For R1            : No appearance
                             For R2            : Mr.J.Chandran


                                                JUDGMENT

The claimants are the appellants in this appeal. They are aggrieved

by the impugned Judgment and decree dated 07.08.2015 passed by the

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 1 of 6 C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge Court, Mettur in

M.C.O.P.No.94 of 2008.

2. By the impugned Judgment and decree, the Tribunal has

awarded a total sum of Rs.1,85,000/- as compensation for the fatal death

of the deceased aged about 66 years at the time of accident. The

claimants are the son and daughter of the deceased.

3. The Tribunal has considered notional income of Rs.3,000/- per

month and has deducted 1/3rd of the amount towards personal expenses

of the deceased. It is further submitted that the Tribunal has not awarded

any amount towards conventional heads and awarded a sum of

Rs.1,25,000/- towards pain and sufferings.

4. Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/Insurance

Company submits that the appellants/claimants themselves have claimed

compensation towards pain and sufferings and therefore the Tribunal has

awarded a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- as against Rs.3,00,000/-.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 2 of 6 C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

5. It is submitted that though the Tribunal has awarded the above

compensation under the head of pain and sufferings, if the amounts are

awarded towards conventional heads, the amount awarded by the

Tribunal can be considered as just compensation and therefore prayed for

confirming the award amount notwithstanding the incorrect basis in the

impugned Judgement and decree awarding the aforesaid sum of

Rs.1,85,000/- as compensation to the appellants/claimants.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the 2 nd

respondent and perused the impugned Judgement and decree and the

records which confirms the basis of the award.

7. This is a case of fatal injury resulting the death of 66 years old

person who was stated to be a coolie. The Tribunal has considered a

meagre income of Rs.3,000/- to award the aforesaid compensation even

though the deceased was aged about 66 years and was stated to be earned

Rs.5,000/- per month.

8. It would be reasonable for the Court to infer that the deceased

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 3 of 6 C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

would have earned a sum of Rs.4,500/- considering the fact that the death

is of the year 2008. The Tribunal has also not awarded compensation

under the conventional heads. Considering the above, this Court is

inclined to recompute the compensation as follows:-

                                      Heads and Calculation                     Amount
                     Loss of earning capacity:-

                     Monthly Income                       : Rs.     4,500/-

                     Less: Personal Expenses 1/3rd
                     (4,500 x 2/3)                        : Rs. 3,000/-
                                                           ----------------
                                                         : Rs. 3,000/-

Annual Contribution to the family (3,000 x 12) : Rs. 36,000/-

Multiplier 5 (36,000 x 5) : Rs. 1,80,000/-

Rs.1,80,000/-

Loss of Love and Affection to the appellants (25,000 x 2) Rs. 50,000/-

                     Loss of Estate                                           Rs.    15,000/-
                     Transportation Charges                                   Rs.      5,000/-
                     Funeral Expenses                                         Rs.      7,500/-
                                              Total                           Rs. 2,57,500/-


Therefore, the compensation of Rs.1,85,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is

enhanced to Rs.2,57,500/- by adding another sum of Rs.72,500/-.

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 4 of 6 C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

9. The 2nd respondent/Insurance Company is therefore directed to

deposit the enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.2,57,500/- together

with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of numbering of the claim

petition till the date of such deposit, less any amount already deposited

by it, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this Judgment.

10. On such deposit being made by the 2nd respondent/Insurance

Company, the appellants/claimants are permitted to withdraw the same

together with interest accrued thereon, less the amount already

withdrawn if any, by filing suitable application before the Tribunal.

11. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands partly allowed with the

above observations. No costs.

17.04.2021 arb Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 5 of 6 C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

C.SARAVANAN, J.

arb

To:

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge Court, Mettur.

C.M.A.No.4175 of 2019

17.04.2021

_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 6 of 6

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter