Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9449 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2021
W.A.No.1580 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
W.A.No.1580 of 2014
A.J.Mohammed Iqbal .. Appellant
Versus
1.Bar Council of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. By its Chairman,
High Court Building,
Chennai-104.
2.V.Raghavachari
3.VLakshmi Narayanan
4.The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board,
Rep. By its Chief Executive Officer,
No.1, Jaffersyrang Street,
Vallalseethakathi Nagar,
Chennai – 1. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order
dated 17.11.2014 passed in W.P.No.29284 of 2014 by the learned Single Judge of this Court.
For Appellant :No Appearance
For R3 : Mr.H.Karthikseshadri
For R1, R2 & R4 : No Appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
W.A.No.1580 of 2014
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.RAJA, J.)
Originally, writ petitioner/A.J.Mohammed Iqbal has filed W.P.No.29284 of 2014
seeking a direction to the first respondent/Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, to dispose of his
petition dated 03.11.2014 requesting to initiate proceedings against the respondents 2 and
3 under Section 35 of the Advocates Act. Learned Single Judge, by order dated 17.11.2014,
dismissed the said writ petition holding that the writ petitioner is not only guilty of abuse
of process of Court in the conduct of the proceedings before the Wakf Tribunal but also
guilty of attempting to remove an inconvenient counsel from appearing for his opponent.
Aggrieved by the same, the writ petitioner has filed the present appeal.
2. No one represented on behalf of the writ petitioner/appellant.
3. Mr.H.Karthik Seshadri, learned counsel for the third respondent, submitted that
the present appeal itself has become infructuous as the petition dated 03.11.2014 filed by
the writ petitioner before the first respondent/Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, has already been
considered and disposed on 24.07.2015, therefore, nothing survives for further
adjudication in the present writ appeal.
4. Recording the submission of the third respondent that the petition dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.1580 of 2014
03.11.2014 of the writ petitioner has already been considered on 24.07.2015, the writ appeal
is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. M.P.No.1 of 2014 is closed.
(T.R., J.) (V.S.G., J.) 09.04.2021
rkm
To
1.The Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, High Court Building, Chennai-104.
2.The Chief Executive Officer, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffersyrang Street, Vallalseethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 1.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.1580 of 2014
T.RAJA, J.
and V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
rkm
W.A.No.1580 of 2014
09.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!