Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amsha vs S.Ponmudi
2021 Latest Caselaw 9209 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9209 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Amsha vs S.Ponmudi on 7 April, 2021
                                                        CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                               DATED : 07.04.2021

                                   CORAM:

                 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                            CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

Amsha                                                       ... Petitioner
                                   Versus
S.Ponmudi                                                   ... Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the Docket Order passed by the
learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri dated
03.03.2021 and direct the learned Judge to restore the
Crl.M.P.No.340/2021 and the appeal.

                  For Petitioner   :      Mr.Sunder Mohan

                                       *****

                                  ORDER

The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo one year Simple Imprisonment

and to pay compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the respondent, in default

to undergo one months Simple Imprisonment by the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur, by judgment, dated 28.12.2020 in

CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

S.T.C.No.168 of 2016. Against which, the petitioner preferred an appeal

before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri

along with the petition to suspend the sentence under Section 389(i)

Cr.P.C. The appeal was not numbered, on the other hand,

Crl.M.P.No.340 of 2021 was assigned for the suspension of sentence

petition. Thereafter, a memo was filed that on 04.02.2021, the petitioner

has deposited 20% of the compensation amount i.e., Rs.2,00,000/- before

the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri and

produced the receipt to that effect. Thereafter, the case was listed on

15.02.2021 before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge,

Krishnagiri and the petitioner was granted suspension of sentence and

ordered the petitioner to execute a bond for sum of Rs.10,000/- with two

sureties on or before 02.03.2021 and list the case on 03.03.2021.

Thereafter, the petitioner has executed the sureties before the trial Court

on 22.02.2021 and subsequently, the case was listed on 03.03.2021

before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri. On

that day, since the petitioner as well as her counsel were unable to appear

due to some constrains, the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge,

CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

Krishnagiri without verifying and giving opportunity, had straight away

dismissed the suspension of sentence petition for default. Not only

stopped with that. On 09.03.2021, the learned Principal District and

Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri returned the appeal memorandum and made

the endorsement as follows:-

“Returned Suspension of Sentence petition is dismissed for default. Hence, this appeal memorandum is returned.”

2.Challenging the same, the order, dated 03.03.2021 in

Crl.M.P.No.340 of 2021, the petitioner has filed the above petition.

3.The appeal is a statutory appeal. The lower appellate Court (the

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri ought not to have

returned the appeal on technical ground. On perusal of the records, this

Court finds that numbering the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition without

taking the appeal on file is not proper. It is to be seen that the petitioner

had executed the sureties before the trial Court as per the order dated

CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

15.02.2021 and also deposited the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- on

04.02.2021 and filed the memo on 15.02.2021. Hence, the lower

appellate Court has no authority to dismiss the suspension of sentence

and also return the appeal memorandum.

4.In view of the above, this Court set asides the orders, dated

03.03.2021 and 08.03.2021 passed by the learned Principal District and

Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri and directs the learned Principal District and

Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri to take the appeal on file, number it and

dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law. This Criminal

Original Petition is, accordingly, allowed.

07.04.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

vv2

Note: Issue Order Copy on 08.04.2021.

CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

To

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

vv2

CRL.O.P.No.6312 of 2021

07.04.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter