Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9190 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021
W.A.(MD)No.821 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.A.(MD)No.821 of 2021
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.3643 of 2021
1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj,
Panagal Building,
Chennai – 600 015.
3.The District Collector,
Ramanathapuram,
Ramanathapuram District. : Appellants
Vs.
K.Selvaraj : Respondent
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.(MD)No.821 of 2021
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent,
praying to set aside the judgment dated 24.04.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.18368
of 2017, on the file of this Court.
For Appellants : Mr.K.P.Krishnadass
Special Government Pleader
For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Kannappan
JUDGMENT
*************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]
Heard Mr.K.P.Krishnadass, Special Government Pleader,
appearing for the appellants and Mr.A.R.Kannappan, learned Counsel
appearing for the respondent.
2.This appeal by the Government is directed against the order
dated 24.04.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.18368 of 2017.
3.The only ground which is canvassed before us by the learned
Special Government Pleader is that the learned Single Bench has granted
relief to the writ petitioner by taking note of G.O.Ms.No.39 dated
13.06.2011, which provides for counting 50% of the service as part-time
Panchayat Clerk for pension. However, the said Government Order was
withdrawn under G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12.07.2013.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.(MD)No.821 of 2021
4.As rightly pointed out by the learned Counsel for the
respondent / writ petitioner, this issue was considered by the Hon'ble
Division Bench in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu Vs.
P.V.Velliyangiri in W.A.No.431 of 2016 dated 11.04.2016 and
subsequently in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu Vs. Tamil
Nadu Rural Development Official's Association in W.A.No.1111 of
2016 dated 22.03.2018.
5.The learned Single Bench, after taking note of the above
decisions of the Division Bench has granted relief to the respondent / writ
petitioner. Hence, we find no ground to interfere with the order.
6.At this juncture, the learned Counsel for the respondent / writ
petitioner submits that the benefits which accrue to the respondent / writ
petitioner, pursuant to the direction issued in the writ petition may be
directed to be settled by the appellant within a time frame.
7.We note that the respondent / writ petitioner retired on
30.06.2008. Hence, the direction issued by the learned Writ Court be
implemented by the appellants within four [4] months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.(MD)No.821 of 2021
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.
AND S.ANANTHI, J.
MR
8.With the above observation, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed.
However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
[T.S.S., J.] & [S.A.I., J.]
07.04.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
MR
JUDGMENT MADE IN
W.A.(MD)No.821 of 2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!