Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.S.Rajathilagam vs Revenue Divisional Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 9155 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9155 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021

Madras High Court
V.S.Rajathilagam vs Revenue Divisional Officer on 7 April, 2021
                                                                             W.A.No.1524/2016

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 07.04.2021

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
                                               and
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                            W.A.No.1524 of 2016 and
                                             CMP.No.18944 of 2016

                      1. V.S.Rajathilagam
                      2. V.Lakshmi                                         ... Appellants
                                                         -vs-

                      1. Revenue Divisional Officer,
                         Ambattur, Ambattur Road, Ambattur,
                         Chennai-600 053.

                      2. The Tahsildar,
                         Madhavaram Taluk,
                         Madhavaram, Chennai-600 060.

                      3. The Special Tahsildar,
                         Natham Settlement Scheme,
                         Madhavaram Taluk,
                         No.1, Pazhaniappa Nagar,
                         Fifth Street, Madhavaram, Chennai-60.

                      4.S.Gopal Raja                                      ... Respondents


                            Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Pattent against

                      the order dated 8.11.2016 passed in W.P.No.30280/2016 by a learned

                      Single Judge of this Court.




                      1/8
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                   W.A.No.1524/2016

                                        For Appellants       : Mr.K.Bijai Sundar

                                        For Respondents          : Ms.A.B.Reehana Begum,
                                                               Government Advocate for R1 to
                      R3
                                                              Mr.S.R.Raghunathan for R4


                                                  JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was pronounced by T.RAJA, J.)

The Writ Appeal has been preferred against the order dated

8.11.2016 passed in W.P.No.30280/2016 in and by which the learned

Single Judge of this Court has directed the 3rd respondent herein,

namely, the Special Officer, Natham Settlement Scheme,

Madhavaram Taluk, Madhavaram, Chennai, instead of the District

Revenue Officer, who is the Revisional Authority as per Section 13 of

the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 to dispose of the appeal

filed by the appellants herein.

2. The case of the appellants is that the first appellant

purchased a land situated at Madhavaram Village comprised in

Survey No.160/1, consisting of 18 cents of Madhavaram Taluk,

Thiruvallur District from one Jeevammal and others under a deed of

sale dated 16.10.1996 registered as document No.P666 of 1996 and

later numbered as 6235 of 1999, of Book l, at SRO, Sembium.

Subsequently, the petitioner sold a portion of land measuring 1800

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1524/2016

sq.ft. from and out of the aforesaid 18 cents to the second appellant

under a deed of sale dated 27.10.2010 registered as document

No.8884 of 2010. The third respondent also issued pattas to the

appellants to their respective lands along with their photographs.

While so, one Natha Muni Iyya created bogus documents in respect of

the above said property by entering into a sale agreement with one

Mr.C.Sundararam under Document No.3522 of 1982 describing the

land conveyed thereunder as comprised in O.S.No.160 and New

S.No.16D/1 measuring 0.30 cents and later selling it to the fourth

respondent under document No.3080 of 1985 at SRO, Sembiam,

describing the land conveyed thereunder as comprised in O.S.No.160

and New S.No.16B/1 ad-measuring 30 cents. While so, the first

respondent without verifying the said documents, passed the

impugned order, directing the cancellation of patta issued in the

name of the appellants and issuance of patta in the name of the

fourth respondent. Hence, the appellants have filed the W.P.No.

30280/2016 before this Court and a learned Single Judge of this

Court by order dated 8.11.2016 directed the 3rd respondent herein,

namely, the Special Officer, Natham Settlement Scheme,

Madhavaram Taluk, Madhavaram, Chennai, instead of the District

Revenue Officer, who is the Revisional Authority as per Section 13 of

the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 to dispose of the appeal

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1524/2016

filed by the appellants herein. Aggrieved over the same, the present

Writ Appeal has been filed.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants vehemently

argued that in any event, the Tahsildar has no power to cancel the

patta obtained by the appellants long time ago. Again referring to

Sections 10, 12 and 13 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983,

the learned Counsel for the appellants argued that if there is any

disputed question arises in respect of the land-in-question for the

purpose of issuance of patta, only the competent civil court has got

jurisdiction, but not the Revenue Authority. Therefore, on that score,

when once the Tahsildar has granted patta in favour of the appellants

long time ago, the same Tahsildar cannot reissue the patta to the 4 th

respondent. Learned Counsel also argued that as against the order

cancelling the patta, an appeal has been filed before the Revenue

Divisional Officer as early as on 31.08.2016.

4. Learned Counsel appearing for the 4th respondent in reply

to the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants argued

that when the patta was issued in respect of the land-in-question in

favour of the appellants, an appeal was filed before the Revenue

Divisional Officer under Section 12 of the Act by the 4 th respondent,

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1524/2016

who in turn, while allowing the same, issued the patta in favour of

the 4th respondent herein. Aggrieved thereby, a Revision has been

filed under Section 13 of the Act before the District Revenue Officer

by the appellants herein. After filing the revision, for the reason best

known to them, the appellants have filed the W.P.No.30280/2016

before this Court and the same was disposed of by a learned Single

Judge of this Court by order dated 08.11.2016, thereby directing the

3rd respondent herein, namely, the Special Officer, Natham

Settlement Scheme, Madhavaram Taluk, Madhavaram, Chennai, to

dispose of the appeal filed by the appellants herein. Aggrieved over

the same, the present Writ Appeal has been filed, which is not

sustainable, it is pleaded.

5. Heard Mrs.A.B.Reehana Begum, learned Government

Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3.

6. We have also gone through the records carefully

including the order dated 08.11.2016 passed by the learned Single

Judge of this Court.

7. On the face of the records, more particularly, the

impugned order of the learned Single Judge, we are of the view that

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1524/2016

now the issue deserves to be considered by this Bench falls under a

narrow campus for the simple reason that the learned Single Judge in

his order dated 08.11.2016 made in W.P.No.30280/2016 directed the

Special Tahsildar, Natham Settlement Scheme, Madhavaram,

Chennai, the 3rd respondent herein, to dispose of the appeal filed by

the appellants herein instead of directing the District Revenue Officer.

Since as per Section 13 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983,

the District Revenue Officer is the competent authority to dispose of

the appeal filed by the appellants herein. Hence, though several

grounds have been raised on either side, without going into the

merits of the claim made by both parties, we think it fit to remand

the matter to the District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur District with a

direction to dispose of the issue-in-question within a specified period

and by remanding the matter to the District Revenue Officer, in our

considered opinion, no prejudice would be caused to either side.

Further, it appears that the Revenue Divisional Officer has already

disposed of the appeal filed by the appellants.

8. In view of all the above, without going into the merits of

the claim made by both sides, we therefore, rectifying the error in the

Order dated 08.11.2016 made in W.P.No.30280/2017, hereby remand

the matter back to the District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur District,

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1524/2016

with a direction to take up the matter and after issuing notice and

affording an opportunity of personal hearing to both sides, decide the

issue-in-question on merits and in accordance with law, within a

period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

9. With the above observation and direction, the Writ Appeal

is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous

Petition is also dismissed.

                                                                   (T.R.J.,)     (G.K.I.J.,)

                                                                         07.04.2021
                      tsi

                      To
                      1. Revenue Divisional Officer,
                         Ambattur,
                         Ambattur Road, Ambattur,
                         Chennai-600 053.

                      2. The Tahsildar,
                         Madhavaram Taluk,
                         Madhavaram, Chennai-600 060.

                      3. The Special Tahsildar,
                         Natham Settlement Scheme,
                         Madhavaram Taluk,
                         No.1, Pazhaniappa Nagar,
                         Fifth Street, Madhavaram, Chennai-60.

                      Copy to:

The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1524/2016

T.RAJA, J.

and G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

tsi

W.A.No.1524/2016

07.04.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter