Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11073 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2021
C.S.No.137 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.137 of 2003
K.R.Nath
26/2, Bhagirathi Ammal Street,
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ...Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Raj Television Network Ltd.,
rep. By its Managing Director,
32, Poes Road, 2nd Street,
Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018.
2.Vijay Television Ltd.,
Unit of Star Network,
rep. By its Managing Director,
15, Jagannathan Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ...Defendants
Prayer: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule (1) of the Original Side rules r/w
Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C., r/w Sections 55, 56, 60 & 62 of the Copyright
Act, 1957, praying as follows:-
a) declaration that the plaintiff is the sole and absolute owner of
the copyright to exhibit, exploit and distribute the Tamil Talkie movie titled
as “Ananda Aradanai” featuring Mohan, Suhasini, Srividya and others
directed by Dinesh Babu, more particularly described in the schedule
hereunder, over the satellite television broadcasting right through out the
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.S.No.137 of 2003
world and all other electronic media rights now in existence or to be
introduced in future and all rights assigned to the plaintiff pursuant to the
agreement and declaration dated 26.12.1994;
b) granting an order of permanent injunction restraining the first
and second defendants, their servants, agents, men and / or any other person
claiming through them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's
copyright in the suit Tamil film “Ananda Aradanai” to exhibit, exploit and
distribute the suit film more particularly described in the schedule
hereunder, for the satellite broadcasting territory and in other modern
medias;
c) costs of the suit;
For Plaintiff : Ms.Sahana for Mr.P.L.Narayanan
For Defendants : Ms.Monica Chopra for
Mr.K.Harishankar for D1
Mr.D.Vivekananda for
Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan for D2
JUDGMENT
Ms.Sahana representing Mr.P.L.Narayanan, learned counsel for
the plaintiff would submit that the suit itself has been settled.
2.Ms.Monica Chopra representing Mr.K.Harishankar, learned
counsel for the 1st defendant and Mr.D.Vivekananda representing
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.137 of 2003
Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan, learned counsel for the 2nd defendant would also
affirm the said statement.
3. In view of the same, this suit is dismissed as settled out of
Court. No costs.
29.04.2021 kkn
Internet:Yes Index:No Non-Speaking
List of witness and documents filed on the side of the plaintiff:
Nil
List of witness and documents filed on the side of the defendants:
Nil
29.04.2021 kkn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.137 of 2003
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
KKN
C.S.No.137 of 2003
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.137 of 2003
29.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!