Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ellamma vs Mohideen
2021 Latest Caselaw 10742 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10742 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Ellamma vs Mohideen on 27 April, 2021
                                                                         C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 27.04.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                             C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

                     CMA.No.1001 of 2012

                     Ellamma                                                      ... Appellant

                                                         Versus

                     1.Mohideen
                     2.New India Assurance Co.Ltd.,
                       rep. by its Manager, Branch Office,
                       Bye pass Road, Hosur,
                       Dharmapuri District                                        ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the decree and judgment dated 31.03.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.69 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Hosur insofar as the disallowed portion of Rs.1,79,000/- (Restricted to Rs.65,000/- in this appeal) alone.


                     CMA.No.1002 of 2012

                     Maramma                                                      ... Appellant





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

Versus

1.Mohideen

2.New India Assurance Co.Ltd., rep. by its Manager, Branch Office, Bye pass Road, Hosur, Dharmapuri District ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the decree and judgment dated 31.03.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.71 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Hosur insofar as the disallowed portion of Rs.87,000/- alone.


                     CMA.No.1003 of 2012

                     P.Ramakka                                                ... Appellant

                                                       Versus

                     1.Mohideen
                     2.New India Assurance Co.Ltd.,
                       rep. by its Manager, Branch Office,
                       Bye pass Road, Hosur,
                       Dharmapuri District                                    ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the decree and judgment dated 31.03.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.72 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Hosur insofar as the disallowed portion of Rs.1,79,000/- alone.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

CMA.No.1004 of 2012

Chinnamma ... Appellant

Versus

1.Mohideen

2.New India Assurance Co.Ltd., rep. by its Manager, Branch Office, Bye pass Road, Hosur, Dharmapuri District ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the decree and judgment dated 31.03.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.73 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Hosur insofar as the disallowed portion of Rs.1,35,000/- alone.


                                             For Appellant
                                                   in all CMA's : Mr.V.Kumaravelan

                                             For Respondents
                                                   in all CMA's
                                                   For R2       : Mrs.C.Sangamithirai
                                                   R1           : Exparte

                                                COMMON J U D G M E N T

These appeals have been laid as against the judgment and decree

dated 31.03.2006 made in M.C.O.P.Nos.69, 71 to 73 of 2001 on the file of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Hosur.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to

hereunder according to their litigative status before the Tribunal.

3. Heard Mr.V.Kumaravelan, learned counsel appearing for the

appellants / claimants and Mrs.C.Sangamithirai, learned counsel appearing

for the second respondent herein.

4. It is seen that all the claimants traveled as cooli in the lorry

owned by the first respondent and its driver drove in a rash and negligent

manner and the accident took place. Due to the said accident, all the

claimants were thrown out of the lorry and sustained grievous injuries. The

Tribunal awarded compensation to be payable by the first respondent for the

reason that the policy does not cover unauthorised passengers. Admittedly,

all the claimants traveled in the goods vehicle. The policy issued by the

second respondent does not cover unauthorised passengers traveled in a

goods vehicle. Therefore, the Tribunal rightly awarded compensation as

against the first respondent i.e. the owner of the vehicle. As such this Court

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

finds no infirmity or illegality in the orders passed by the court below.

Accordingly, all the appeals are dismissed insofar as liability is concerned.

5. Insofar as quantum of compensation is concerned, for the

claimant in CMA.No.1001 of 2012, the Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.71,000/- as compensation. The claimant sustained following injuries:

(i) A contusion of 3 cm dia seen over the left eye

(ii) 3 tooth fell down (lower side)

(iii) Right fore arm fracture

(iv) Pain over left side of the head

(v) Injury over Ribs on both side and multiple injuries all over the

body

(vi) Multiple and grievous injuries all over the body

5.1 The doctor assessed the disability at 30% as permanent

disability. The Tribunal failed to award compensation for a sum of

Rs.2,000/- per percentage for her disability. Therefore, this Court is inclined

to award a sum of Rs.60,000/- towards permanent disablement and

Rs.10,000/- towards extra nourishment, transport and medical expenditure.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

Accordingly the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP.No.69 of

2001 stands modified as under :-

                      Sl.              Head              Amount awarded by       Amount awarded
                      No.                                  the Tribunal           by this Court
                      1        Permanent disability     Rs.30,000/-             Rs.60,000/-
                      2        Pain and suffering       Rs.35,000/-             Rs.35,000/-
                      3        Loss of income           Rs.3,000/-              Rs.3,000/-
                      4        Extra nourishment,       Rs.3,000/-              Rs.10,000/-
                               transport and medical
                               expenditure
                               Total                 Rs.71,000/-          Rs.1,08,000/-

6. Insofar as quantum of compensation is concerned, for the

claimant in CMA.No.1002 of 2012, the Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.73,000/- as compensation. The claimant sustained following injuries:

(i) Lacerated injury of 3 x ½ cm muscle deep see over the middle of

the vertex bleeding

(ii) C/o.Pai over the Rt.side of the Chest and Rt Side of the abdomen

(iii) C/o.Pain over the limber region

6.1 The doctor assessed the disability at 30% as permanent

disability. The Tribunal failed to award compensation for a sum of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

Rs.2,000/- per percentage for permanent disability. Therefore, this Court is

inclined to award a sum of Rs.60,000/- towards permanent disablement.

Accordingly the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP.No.71 of

2001 stands modified as under :-

                      Sl.               Head             Amount awarded by        Amount awarded
                      No.                                  the Tribunal            by this Court
                      1        Permanent disability     Rs.30,000/-              Rs.60,000/-
                      2        Pain and suffering       Rs.35,000/-              Rs.35,000/-
                      3        Loss of income           Rs.3,000/-               Rs.3,000/-
                      4        Extra nourishment,       Rs.5,000/-               Rs.10,000/-
                               transport and medical
                               expenditure
                               Total                    Rs.73,000/-              Rs.1,08,000/-


7. Insofar as quantum of compensation is concerned, for the

claimant in CMA.No.1003 of 2012, the Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.71,000/- as compensation. The claimant sustained following injuries:

(i) Lacerated injury over the middle of vertex

(ii) Fracture of L4 vertebral bone

(iii) Injury min the Right side of the chest and right side of the

abdomen

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

(iv) Injury in lumbar region

7.1 Due to injuries sustained by her, she had taken treatment in

various hospitals. Finally she was admitted in Victoria Hospital, Bangalore,

where she had taken treatment as inpatient for 43 days. The doctor assessed

the disability at 40% as permanent disability. Accordingly the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP.No.72 of 2001 stands modified as

under :-

Sl. Head Amount awarded by Amount awarded No. the Tribunal by this Court 1 Permanent disability Rs.35,000/- Rs.80,000/- 2 Pain and suffering Rs.25,000/- Rs.50,000/- 3 Loss of income Rs.5,000/- Rs.5,000/-

4 Medical expenditure Rs.1,300/- Rs.1,300/- 5 Extra nourishment and Rs.4,700/- Rs.10,000/-

transportation Total Rs.71,000/- Rs.1,46,300/-

8. Insofar as quantum of compensation is concerned, for the

claimant in CMA.No.1004 of 2012, the Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.65,000/- as compensation. The claimant sustained following injuries:

(i) A contusion of 2 cm dia seen over the 1/3 of left clavicle.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

Fracture of middle 1/3 clavicle

(ii) An abrasion of ½ x ½ cm seen over the left elbow joint

(iii) C/o.pain over the lower 1/3rd of RT Fore Arm

(iv) Fracture on left side rib

8.1 The doctor assessed the disability at 25% as permanent

disability. The Tribunal failed to award compensation for a sum of

Rs.2,000/- per percentage for her disability. Therefore, this Court is inclined

to award a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards permanent disablement. Accordingly

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP.No.73 of 2001 stands

modified as under :-

                      Sl.                 Head             Amount awarded by        Amount awarded
                      No.                                    the Tribunal            by this Court
                      1        Permanent disability       Rs.35,000/-              Rs.50,000/-
                      2        Pain and suffering         Rs.25,000/-              Rs.25,000/-
                      3        Loss of income             Rs.3,000/-               Rs.5,000/-
                      4        Extra nourishment,         Rs.2,000/-               Rs.10,000/-
                               transportation
                               Total                      Rs.65,000/-              Rs.90,000/-


9. In the result the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are partly allowed

as follows:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

(i) The award passed by the Tribunal are modified from Rs.71,000/- to Rs.1,08,000/- in MCOP.No.69 of 2001, Rs.73,000/- to Rs.1,08,000/- in MCOP.No.71 of 2001, Rs.71,000/- to Rs.1,46,300/- in MCOP.No.72 and Rs.65,000/- to Rs.90,000/- in MCOP.No.73 of 2001.

(ii) The award amount will carry the interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of the claim petition till the date of deposit.

(iii) The first respondent herein is directed to deposit the award amount, less the amount, if any, already deposited, along with accrued interest within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Judgment.

(iv) On such deposit, the appellants / claimants are permitted to withdraw the amount awarded as above by filing proper application before the Tribunal.

(v) The appellants/claimants are not entitled to any interest for the condoned delay (default) period, if any.

(vi) The appellants / claimants shall pay requisite Court fee before the receipt of the copy of the judgment for the enhanced compensation.

(vii) There shall be no order as to costs.

27.04.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/no Speaking/Non-speaking Order

lok

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Hosur

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok

C.M.A.Nos.1001 to 1004 of 2012

27.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter