Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10405 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021
C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
and
C.M.P.No.10608 of 2020
(Through Video Conferencing)
The New India Assurance Company Ltd.,
Divisional Office
Sethukrishna Trade Centre
No.133/31-A, 2nd Floor,
Trichy Main Road,
Near Raja Sabari Theatre,
Gugai, Salem 636 006. ... Appellant
vs.
1.Baskar
2.R.P.Paramasivam ... Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Decree and Judgment dated 30.08.2019
made in M.C.O.P.No.331 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Court No.2 )Salem.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No 1 of 8
C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
For Appellant : Mrs.R.Sreevidhya
For Respondents : M/s.A.V.Arun
JUDGMENT
The appellant Insurance Company is aggrieved by the impugned
Judgment and decree dated 28.01.2015 passed the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Court No.2) Salem in M.C.O.P.No.331 of
2015.
2. By the impugned Judgment and decree, the Tribunal has
awarded a sum of Rs.24,87,019/- as compensation for the injury suffered
by the 1st respondent/claimant.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant Insurance company
submits that the Tribunal erred in awarding a higher compensation for
pain and sufferings, future medical expenses, attender charges , transport
charges and extra nourishment. He is therefore prayed for modification
of the award amount in the impugned Judgment and decree.
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 2 of 8 C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
4. Defending the impugned Judgment and decree, the learned
counsel for the 1st respondent/claimant submits that though the Tribunal
has awarded a lower compensation. Since the 1st respondent/claimant
has not filed any appeal for enhancement, the awa4d amount may be
confirmed. It is submitted that the claimant was entitled to higher
compensation as the 1st respondent/claimant was working as a supervisor
and earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- p.m. It is submitted that the Tribunal
has fixed a notional income of only Rs.8,000/- p.m to arrive at the
compensation. He therefore submits that the Tribunal ought to have
awarded higher compensation.
5. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned
counsel for the appellant Insurance company and the 1st respondent and I
have also perused the impugned Judgment and decree passed by the
Tribunal. I have also perused the exhibits and prescriptions of the
evidence on record before the Tribunal.
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 3 of 8 C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
6. Ex.P.2 – Wound Certificate has brought to the nature of injury
suffered by the claimant, which reads as follows:
i) Diffuse axonal injuries
ii) Brain stem contusion
iii) Left leg both bone fracture malunion.
The wound certificate of Sri Ramachandra Medical College Hospital,
Porur, Chennai has qualified the nature of injury suffered by the 1st
respondent/claimant was grievous in nature.
7. From the materials available on record, it is seen that the
Tribunal has held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent
driving of the Maruti Swift Dzire Car by its driver belonging to the 1 st
respondent. The 1st respondent/claimant has taken treatment as an in-
patient at Sree Ramachandra Medical College Hospital, Porur, Chennai,
from 19.09.2014 to 12.11.2014. He was thereafter again admitted for
treatment in SRM Medical College Hospital, Kancheepuram from
13.11.2014 to 23.01.2015 and thereafter again admitted for treatment in
the same hospital from 14.05.2015 to 26.05.2015 i.e. for a period of 139
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 4 of 8 C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
days and thereafter plastic surgery was done. The 1 st
respondent/claimant was also referred to Medical Board, Salem. The
Medical Board had examined the 1st respondent/claimant and assessed
the permanent disability of the 1st respondent/claimant as 30%. The
record also indicates that the claim petition was filed by the 1st
respondent/claimant’s father Muthusamy and the 1st respondent/claimant
referred to as a person of unsound mind .
8. In my view, the Tribunal has awarded lesser compensation
towards permanent disability by considering the notional income of
Rs.8,000/- p.m. Nevertheless, the Tribunal has awarded higher amount
of compensation under the other heads which more or less make up for
the lesser compensation due to the lower notional income of Rs.8,000/-
p.m.
9. The first respondent/claimant was aged about 23 years at the
time of accident. The nature of injury also stands corroborated by the
secondary evidence from Ex.C.1 disability certificate issued by the
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 5 of 8 C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
Medical Board. The 1st respondent/claimant is a dependent of his
family members. He was represented by his father, Muthusamy. He
suffered permanent disability. Though, it is noticed that the Tribunal
has has not awarded towards any loss of marital prospects to the 1 st
respondent/claimant, no further amount is also required to be added as
compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the other heads are slightly
higher. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to uphold the
compensation awarded by the Tribunal. There shall be however no
interest on a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- awarded towards future medical
expenses from the date of claim petition till the date of impugned
Judgment and decree. But for the above, there shall be no other
modification of the amount awarded by the Tribunal.
10. The appellant Insurance Company is therefore directed to
deposit the award amount of Rs.23,87,019/- together with interest at
7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of such
deposit, less any amount already deposited, within a period of six weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The appellant -
Insurance Company shall also deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 6 of 8 C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
future medical expenses, from the date of claim petition till the date of
deposit. On such amount of Rs.1,00,000/- the appellant/Insurance
Company is liable to pay interest from the date of award till the date of
deposit at 6%.
11. On such deposit, 1st respondent/claimant is permitted to
withdraw the aforesaid amount of compensation, less any amount already
withdrawn,by filing suitable application before the Tribunal.
12. In the result, the appeal filed by the appellant - Insurance
company stands partly allowed to that extent. No cost. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
23.04.2021
Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No kkd To:-
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Special Sub Court No.2 )Salem.
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 7 of 8 C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020
C.SARAVANAN,J.
kkd
C.M.A.No.1445 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.10608 of 2020
23.04.2021
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No 8 of 8
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!