Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hariprasad Soni vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1941 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1941 MP
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Hariprasad Soni vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 February, 2026

         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:15693




                                                                1                          MCRC-8108-2026
                              IN        THE    HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT JABALPUR
                                                         BEFORE
                                          HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT
                                                 ON THE 24th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                              MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 8108 of 2026
                                                     HARIPRASAD SONI
                                                           Versus
                                               THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                              Shri Utkarsh Patel - Advocate for the applicant.
                              Shri K.S. Baghel - Government Advocate for the State.

                                                                    ORDER

This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail relating to FIR/Crime No.262/2025 registered at Police Station - Khitola, Sihora, District - Jabalpur for the offences punishable under Sections 254, 310 (2), 310 (4), 311, 317 (3), 331 (5), 332 (B) and 61 (2) of the BNS and Sections 25, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Applicant is in detention since 23.09.2025.

2. As per prosecution, 169 grams gold which was allegedly looted

from the Bank, has been recovered from the possession of the present applicant.

3. The counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the case. The applicant is a goldsmith and he is running a gold ornament shop. No ornament looted from the bank has been recovered from his possession. In fact molten gold biscuits have been recovered from the applicant which belong to his gold of his

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:15693

2 MCRC-8108-2026 shop. He has no criminal antecedent. It is further contended that the alleged incident had taken place on 11.08.2025 and recovery in question was done on 23.09.2025 that too from residence of the present applicant. Three other co-accused persons who have alleged to have committed robbery by wearing mask have already been released on bail. The present applicant is in custody since 23.09.2025 and charge sheet has been filed and no custodial confinement of the present applicant is required. Trial will take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the applicant be released on bail.

4 . Per contra, counsel for the State has opposed the application and prays for rejection of the bail application. It is further submitted by him that a large amount of gold looted from the bank has been recovered from

possession of the present applicant. The applicant belongs to State of Bihar and the applicant is in contact with other accused persons who also belong to Bihar. Thus, the applicant has played active role in commission of crime in question.

5. Heard the submissions and perused the case diary.

6. The applicant is a goldsmith and he is running a shop of gold ornament. He has no criminal antecedent. No gold ornaments looted from the bank has been recovered from the possession of the applicant but gold biscuit of 169 grams have been recovered which cannot be said to an exception as the applicant is a gold smith and running a shop of gold ornaments. There is no specific details indicating that the gold recovered from the applicant is part of looted. Therefore, considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 23.09.2025 coupled with the fact that trial will

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:15693

3 MCRC-8108-2026 take a considerable time as well as principle 'bail is the rule and jail is the exception' without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I deem it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Therefore, the application is allowed.

7. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section 480(3) of BNSS, 2023. It is further directed that the applicant shall mark his presence before the concerned police station on Monday of every first week of the month during trial.

8. He shall not involve himself in any criminal activity. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.

(SANDEEP N. BHATT) JUDGE

ks

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter