Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 3349 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3349 MP
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Jitendra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 April, 2026

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9288




                                                             1                             MCRC-13304-2026
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT INDORE
                                                       BEFORE
                                     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                   ON THE 7 th OF APRIL, 2026
                                            MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 13304 of 2026
                                                        JITENDRA
                                                          Versus
                                              THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Hritwike Raj Singh - Advocate for the applicant.

                                   Shri Bhaskar Agrawal - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

                                                                 ORDER

This first bail application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No. 18/2026 registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District- Ujjain, (M.P.) for an offence punishable under Sections 49(A) of M.P. Excise Act. The applicant is in judicial custody since 19.02.2026.

Heard the arguments.

Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case diary and the relevant material on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter merely on suspicion. The liquor was not seized from active and conscious possession of the applicant. The investigation is almost

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9288

2 MCRC-13304-2026 complete. Further custodial interrogation of the applicant is not needed in the matter. The alleged offence is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. There is no likelihood of tampering with evidence by the applicant for the reason that he is a labourer by profession and is not capable to influence the prosecution witnesses. Learned counsel for the applicant states that no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the applicant and the dependent family. Applicant is ready to cooperate in further investigation/ trial.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/State opposes the bail application on the ground of gravity of alleged offence. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant is aged 25 years and he is a labourer by

profession.

As per accusation on case diary, S.I. - Jay Prakash Sharma of the Police Station Kotwali intercepted Jitendra(applicant) near bushes at Nazar Ali Mill Premises to verify the secret information on 19.02.2026. Applicant was found selling spurious liquor. A plastic cane was recovered from the applicant. On search of the plastic cane, country-made raw liquor total quantity - 05 bulk litres was recovered and seized. The liquor was suspected to be unfit for human consumption. The applicant could not produce any valid permit / license. He was apprehended on the spot. The contentions advanced by the applicant have prima-facie merit and cannot be dismissed as manifestly baseless. The veracity of prosecution and complicity of the applicant will be determined after evidence in the trial.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9288

3 MCRC-13304-2026 As informed, the applicant has responsibility of dependent family. Considering these aspects, there appears to be no possibility of fleeing from justice. In absence of any criminal antecedents, considering the socio- economic status of the applicant, there appears to be no likelihood of recidivism or tampering with evidence or influencing the witnesses by the applicant. The offence is triable by JMFC. There appears to be no compelling reason to continue incarceration of the applicant. However, the observations, herein-above, are recorded for present application only.

Considering the rival contentions and overall circumstances of the case, in the light of aforestated facts, but without commenting on the merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

Accordingly, it is directed that applicant - Jitendra shall be released on bail in connection with the Crime, as mentioned in first paragraph of this order, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions : (For convenience of understanding by accused and surety, the conditions of bail are also reproduced in Hindi asunder):-

(1) Applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned court;

(1) आवेदक संबंिधत यायालय के िनदशानुसार सुनवाई क येक ितिथ पर उप थत रहे गा । (2) Applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of similar nature; (2) आवेदक समान कृ ित का केाई अपराध नह ं करे गा या उसम स मिलत नह ं होगा । (3) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer;

(3) आवेदक करण के त य से प रिचत कसी य को य या अ य प से लोभन, धमक या

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9288

4 MCRC-13304-2026 वचन नह ं दे गा, जससे ऐसा य ऐसे त य को यायालय या पुिलस अिधकार को कट करने से िनवा रत हो ।

(4) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to tamper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

(4) आवदे क य या अ य प से सा य के साथ छे डछाड करने का या सा ी या सा य को बहलाने-फुसलाने, दबाव डालने या धमकाने का यास नह ं करे गा । (5) During trial, the applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C./346 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding examination of witnesses in attendance;

(5) वचारण के दौरान, उप थत गवाह से पर ण के संबंध म आवेदक धारा ३०९ दं . .सं./ ३४६ भारतीय नाग रक सुर ा सं हता, 2023 के ावधान का उिचत अनुपालन सुिन त करे गा ।

(6) If FSL report reveals any poisonous substance in the liquor, this bail order shall stand cancelled without further reference to this Court and the applicant shall surrender forthwith.

This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach of any of the preconditions of bail, the trial Court may consider, on merit, cancellation of bail without any impediment from this order.

The trial Court shall get these conditions reproduced on the personal bond by the accused and on surety bond by the surety concerned. If any of them is unable to write, the scribe shall certify that he/she had explained the conditions to the concerned accused or the surety.

C.C. as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE sh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter