Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2596 MP
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2025
1 SA-1012-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
SA No. 1012 of 2016
(SHARAD AND OTHERS Vs PUSHPARANI AND OTHERS )
Dated : 09-01-2025
Shri Sheersh Agrawal - Advocate for the appellants.
Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey - Deputy Government Advocate for the
respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that there is a concurrent findings against the defendants/appellants.
As record is received.
Heard on admission.
It is submitted that there was no evidence placed on record by the respondents/plaintiffs regarding land gifted by the Narbadi Bai to late Anil Kumar and when no partition took place between co-parcners but decree was granted to the respondents/plaintiffs denying the right and title of the defendant over the suit property situated at Bheempur Tehsil Bahinsdehi District Betul. It is fairly submitted that there was no counter claim filed by the appellants/defendants. It is further submitted that Narbadi Bai has no right to gift the land to Anil Kumar, father of the plaintiff as the property was an ancestral property.
Learned counsel for the appellants relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P. Kishore Kumar vs. Vittal K. Patkar, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 999.
Reserved for orders on admission.
(AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE
2 SA-1012-2016 mc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!