Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Snehjeev Farmacy Pvt. Ltd. Through ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 27687 MP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27687 MP
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Snehjeev Farmacy Pvt. Ltd. Through ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 October, 2024

Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla

Bench: Vijay Kumar Shukla

                                                             1                                 MP-6222-2023
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                       BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
                                                ON THE 3 rd OF OCTOBER, 2024
                                               MISC. PETITION No. 6216 of 2023
                              SNEHJEEV FARMS PVT. LTD. THROUGH SANJEEV LUKAND
                                                    Versus
                                  THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                  Shri Pushpraj Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                  Shri Kushagra Jain - Dy.G.A for the respondent No.1/State.
                                  Shri Sukrati Ranjan Solanki - Advocate for the respondent No.3.
                                  Shri Rohinton T.Thanevala - Advocate for the intervener.
                                                                 WITH
                                               MISC. PETITION No. 6217 of 2023
                              SNEHJEEV FARMS PVT. LTD. THROUGH SANJEEV LUKAND
                                                    Versus
                                  THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                  Shri Pushpraj Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                  Shri Kushagra Jain - Dy.G.A for the respondent No.1/State.
                                  Shri Sukrati Ranjan Solanki - Advocate for the respondent No.3.
                                  Shri Rohinton T.Thanevala - Advocate for the intervener.

                                               MISC. PETITION No. 6219 of 2023
                               SNEHJEEV FARMS PVT.LTD. THROUGH SANJEEV LUKAND
                                                    Versus
                                  THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PRAMOD
KUSHWAHA
Signing time: 03-10-2024
17:22:26
                                                            2                                MP-6222-2023
                           Appearance:
                                 Shri Pushpraj Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                 Shri Kushagra Jain - Dy.G.A for the respondent No.1/State.
                                 Shri Sukrati Ranjan Solanki - Advocate for the respondent No.3.
                                 Shri Rohinton T.Thanevala - Advocate for the intervener.

                                              MISC. PETITION No. 6220 of 2023
                              SNEHJEEV FARMS PVT. LTD. THROUGH SANJEEV LUNKAD
                                                    Versus
                                  THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                 Shri Pushpraj Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                 Shri Kushagra Jain - Dy.G.A for the respondent No.1/State.
                                 Shri Sukrati Ranjan Solanki - Advocate for the respondent No.3.
                                 Shri Rohinton T.Thanevala - Advocate for the intervener.

                                              MISC. PETITION No. 6221 of 2023
                             SNEHJEEV FARMACY PVT. LTD. THROUGH SANJEEV LUKAND
                                                    Versus
                                  THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                 Shri Pushpraj Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                 Shri Kushagra Jain - Dy.G.A for the respondent No.1/State.
                                 Shri Sukrati Ranjan Solanki - Advocate for the respondent No.3.
                                 Shri Rohinton T.Thanevala - Advocate for the intervener.

                                              MISC. PETITION No. 6222 of 2023
                             SNEHJEEV FARMACY PVT. LTD. THROUGH SANJEEV LUKAND

Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PRAMOD
KUSHWAHA
Signing time: 03-10-2024
17:22:26
                                                               3                               MP-6222-2023
                                                      Versus
                                     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                  Shri Pushpraj Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                  Shri Kushagra Jain - Dy.G.A for the respondent No.1/State.
                                  Shri Sukrati Ranjan Solanki - Advocate for the respondent No.3.
                                  Shri Rohinton T.Thanevala - Advocate for the intervener.

                                                                  ORDER

Counsel for the respondents raises preliminary objection that these petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are not maintainable in view the judgment passed by the co-ordinate Bench in M.P No.3857/2022 as the petitioner is challenging the order of Revenue Authorities.

At this stage, counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the petitions with liberty to file Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, he submits that there is an interim order in these petitions and the same may be continued till he files fresh petitions and the same are listed for hearing.

Considering the aforesaid prayer, the petitioner is granted liberty to file Writ Petition(s) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India within period of 2 weeks' from today and till the matter(s) is/are taken up by the Court for hearing, admission and stay, the interim order shall continue in those petitions in which it has been granted. It is made clear that if the petition(s)

is/are not filed within the said period, the interim order(s) shall automatically stand vacated.

4 MP-6222-2023

With the aforesaid, all the petitions stands withdrawn.

(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE

PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter