Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14165 MP
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 14 th OF MAY, 2024
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 748 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
HARSEWAK YADAV S/O HALKOTE YADAV, AGED
ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O PREMPURA BALDEVGARH
DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH).
.....PETITIONER
(BY MRS. SANJANA SAHNI - ADVOCATE AND SHRI SAKET MALIK -
ADVOCATE)
AND
1. RAMBHAROSE S/O HUKUM YADAV, AGED ABOUT
40 YEARS, R/O PREMPURA BALDEVGARH
DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH).
2. MUNNA S/O DAYARAM YADAV, AGED ABOUT 49
YEARS, R/O PREMPURA BALDEVGARH DISTRICT
TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH).
3. MOHAN S/O DAYARAM YADAV, AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS, R/O PREMPURA BALDEVGARH DISTRICT
TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH).
4. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
COLLECTOR DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA
PRADESH).
.....RESPONDENTS
This revision coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Applicant has filed this revision against judgment dated 03.01.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 204/2022 by Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh, by
which finding of conviction has been upheld by the appellate Court under Sections 323/34 (four counts), however, sentence has been altered and respondent No.1 to 3 have been sentenced till rising of the Court in place of jail sentence of 6-6 months and fine amount has been enhanced from Rs. 500-500/- to Rs. 1000-1000/-.
2. Counsel appearing for applicant submitted that appellate Court had committed an error in exercising its jurisdiction to alter the sentence. Reasons which were given for altering the sentence are not adequate. In view of same, notices be issued and revision be admitted.
3. Heard the counsel for the applicant.
4. Section 386(b)(iii) gives power to appellate Court to alter the nature or the extent of sentence but not so as to enhance the same. Appellate Court has altered the sentence without enhancing it. Therefore, error jurisdiction has not been committed.
5. Counsel appearing for applicant has argued that proper reasons have not been assigned for altering the sentence. On going through judgment of appellate Court, it is found that appellate Court has also assigned reasons for altering the sentence. It has been mentioned that respondents do not have any criminal record and history. There was open fight between the parties. Simple injuries are caused and respondents are facing litigation for 6 years. Sufficient reasons have been given in the judgment passed by appellate Court for altering the sentence.
6. In these circumstances, I do not find any error of jurisdiction in judgment dated 03.01.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 204/2022 by Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh. Criminal revision filed by applicant is dismissed.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE vkt
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!