Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5529 MP
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
ON THE 22 nd OF FEBRUARY, 2024
ARBITRATION APPEAL No. 309 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GWALIOR PROJECT DIVISION, CPWD NEAR KV-5
SHASTRI NAGAR THATIPUR, GWALIOR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI PRAVEEN KUMAR NEWASKAR - ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S QUALITY CONSTRUCTION CO. AGRA AGRA (UTTAR
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI PRASHANT SHARMA - ADVOCATE)
This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
1. The present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") taking exception to the order dated 19-09-2023 passed in MJC No.AV/22/2021 by the Commercial Court & Commercial Appellate Court, Gwalior whereby the objections filed by the appellant against the arbitral award dated 27-01-2021 passed by the Arbitrator has been rejected.
2. Counsel for the appellant raised all the grounds as available to him in accordance with law. According to him, appellant raised three grounds; (i)
award is against the Public Policy, (ii) amount awarded has travelled beyond the
terms of contract and (iii) terms and conditions of contract were not followed. Therefore, respondent is not entitled to get the awarded sum.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent referred order dated 10-04-2023 passed in Arbitration Appeal No.03/2014 wherein the Coordinate Bench in almost similar facts situation decided the case and held that scope of Section 37 of the Act is very limited in view of the judgment of Apex Court in the case of McDermott International Inc. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and others, (2006) 11 SCC 181 and dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant - Union of India.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant could not dispute
passing of such order as Shri Newaskar appeared in the said appeal, however he tried to distinguish the case.
5. Considering the rival submissions and going through the mandate of Apex Court in the case of McDermott International Inc. (supra) and contents of order dated 10-04-2023 passed in Arbitration Appeal No.03/2014, it appears that no case for interference is made out. Scope of Section 37 of the Act is very limited and therefore, appeal deserves dismissal.
6. Resultantly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
(ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Anil*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!