Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5486 MP
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR-IV
ON THE 22 nd OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. PETITION No. 2442 of 2019
BETWEEN:-
CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION THROUGH
ITS REGIONAL MANAGER OFFICE - 75 ARERA HILLS
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI ARVIND KUMAR AGRAWAL - ADVOCATE)
AND
VACHAN SINGH KANSANA S/O SHRI DEVI SINGH
K A N S A N A R/O DATTPURA, MORENA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 5.2.2019 passed by District
Judge, Morena in Execution Case No.23/88x96 whereby District Judge, Morena dismissed the entire execution proceeding. Impugned order dated 5.2.2019 reads as under:
fMdzh/kkjh }kjk Jh iou n.Mksfr;k vf/koDrk mifLFkrA en~;qu vuqifLFkrA en~;qu cpuflag ds fo:) tkjh dqdhZ okj.V bl vk'k; dh fjiksVZ ds lkFk izkIr gqvk gS fd ^fn;s x;s irs ij en~;qu ugh feyk^
dqdhZ okj.V ij bl vk'k; dh Vhi Hkh vafdr dh xbZ gS fd ^en~;qu mDr irs ij ugh jgrk gS] og xkWo esa jgrk gS ,oa mldh mDr irs ij dksbZ laifRr ugh gSA iwoZ esa tkjh dqdhZ okj.V ij Hkh blh vk'k; dh Vhi vafdr dh xbZ FkhA fnukad 29-01-2019 dks fMdzh/kkjh dks vknsf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk fd og en~;qu cpuflag dh vpy laifRr dk C;kSjk izLrqr djs fdUrq blds ckotwn fMdzh/kkjh }kjk en~;qu cpuflag dh vpy laifRr ds ckjs esas dksbZ tkudkjh ugha nh xbZ gSA fMdzh/kkjh }kjk cpuflag dh vpy laifRr ds laca/k esa tkudkjh nsus esa mnklhurk cjr jgs gSaA ;g izdj.k 20 o"kZ ls vf/kd vof/k ls yafcr gS fMdzh/kkjh }kjk nf'kZr mnklhurk dks n`f"Vxr
j[krs gq;s bl ekeys dks vkSj pyk;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; izrhr ugh gksrk gSA bl izdze ij izdj.k dh dk;Zokgh fMdzh/kkjh dh vksj ls en~;qu dh dqdhZ ;ksX; py ,oa vpy laifRr dh tkudkjh is'k u fd;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij lekIr dh tkrh gSA izdj.k dk ifj.kke iath esa ntZ dj fjdkMZ vfHkys[kkxkj esa tek fd;k tkosA
2. Notice sent to judgment debtor/respondent is unserved with the note "incomplete address".
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that judgment debtor/respondent has been running absent in execution proceeding also. Impugned order affects the right of the petitioner.
5. Petitioner has filed paper of the property of judgment debtor Vachan Singh which shows that judgment debtor has a considerable land/property and
recovery can be effected in accordance with law.
6. In view of above, petition is allowed setting aside the impugned order passed by District Judge, Morena. Executing Court is directed to proceed with the execution proceeding in accordance with law. Petitioner shall file the paper of property of Vachan Singh before the Executing Court.
(RAJENDRA KUMAR-IV) JUDGE (alok)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!