Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3055 MP
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 1 st OF FEBRUARY, 2024
REVIEW PETITION No. 1397 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, TREASURY AND
ACCOUN TS DIVISION REWA DISTRICT REWA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SHIPI PLAZA,
DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. DIVSIONAL DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER, REWA
DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SANKUL PRINCIPAL, GOVT HIGHER SECONDARY
SCHOOL, JUDAURI BLOCK GANGEO DISTRICT
REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI MANAS MANI VERMA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
AND
TULSIDAS MISHRA S/O SHRI SHESH PRASAD MISHRA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED PEON
IN THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL GOVT. HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL JUDAURI BLOCK GANGEO
DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This review petition is filed seeking the review of the order dated 26.04.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.6671 of 2022 wherein it is mentioned that the judgments in the cases of Tejulal Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh, ILR (2009) MP 1326 and in the case of Dheeraj Lal Yadav v. State of MP (WP No.5445/2014) will be applicable to the case of the petitioner.
It is submitted by learned Government Advocate that the facts of the case of Dheeraj Lal Yadav (supra) are different inasmuch as in that case the petitioner - Dheeraj Lal was admittedly regularised on class IV post on completion of ten years' services in the work charged establishment. Thus, consequent to absorption in regular establishment, facts of that case will not be
applicable to the facts of the present case.
To the aforesaid extent, review petition is allowed and the order impugned is corrected to the extent that the petitioner's case will be covered by the decision in the case of Tejulal Yadav (supra) and so also law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and Others v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer), (2015) 4 SCC 334.
Other terms and conditions of the impugned order shall remain in tact. Accordingly, the review petition is disposed of.
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE ks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!