Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 16206 MP
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
ON THE 3 rd OF OCTOBER, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 18653 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
AWASHESH KUMAR SAKET S/O SHRI RAGHUNATH
PRASAD SAKET, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
DAILY RATED EMPLOYEE (WATER SUPPLIER/ PEON/
JAL WAHAK) SHASKIYA UTKRISHTA ANUSUCHIT JATI
BALAK CHHATRAVAS, RAIPUR KARCHULIYAN
DISTRICT REWA (ORALLY TERMINATED) R/O VILLAGE
AND POST PURAINI JAGIR TEHSIL HUZUR DISTRICT
REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI RAMJEE SHUKLA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
DEPUTY SECRETARY GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA
VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. COLLECTOR (ANUSUCHIT JATI / JAN KARYA
V I B H A G ) R E WA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. DISTRICT COORDINATOR (JILA SANYOJAK)
ADIM JATI KALYAN REWA DISTRICT REWA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SUPERINTENDENT SHASKIYA UTKRISHTA
ANUSUCHIT JATI BALAK CHHATRAVAS RAIPUR
KARCHULIYAN DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI MOHAN SAUSARKAR - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE )
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
2
ORDER
This Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking following relief:
"(i) Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as daily rated employee as usual in Shaskiya Utkrishta Anusuchit Jati Balak Chhatravas, Raipur Karchuliyan, District Rewa by allowing him to mark his presence in Attendance Register of Shaskiya Utkrishta Anusuchit Jati Balak Chhatravas, Raipur Karchuliyan, District Rewa in the interest of justice.
(ii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be issue in favour of the petitioner along with cost of the petition."
2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that petitioner was appointed as daily rated employee in the year 2017. However, w.e.f. July, 2022, respondents have verbally terminated his services.
3. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.
4. Petition is completely silent as to whether appointment of petitioner was illegal or irregular. Further, in the light of judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Uma Devi (3) and Others reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1, the State was authorized to take one-time measure to regularize the services of those irregularly appointed employees, who had already put in 10 years of service on the date of pronouncement of judgment passed in the case of Uma Devi (supra) i.e. 10.04.2006.
5. In absence of any right of petitioner, this Court is of considered opinion
that no relief can be granted to petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India. However, petitioner is granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if available, for redressal of his grievances under the Labour Law.
6. With aforesaid observation, petition is dismissed.
(G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE Shanu
Digitally signed by SHANU RAIKWAR Date: 2023.10.03 18:19:48 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!