Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2354 MP
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 9 th OF FEBRUARY, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 15851 of 2003
BETWEEN:-
RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, SON
OF SHRI B.L. PANDEY, TRAINING AND PLACEMENT
OFFICER, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLETGE,
KHIRSADON, DISTRICT CHHINDWARA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(NONE PRESENT)
AND
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH THE
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL
EDUCATION, MAN POWER AND PLANNING, VALLABH
BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI SOURABH SONI - PANEL LAWYER)
Th is petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
T h is writ petition is filed being aggrieved of the decision of the respondent authority to reject petitioner's claim for upgradation in the pay scale of Rs.3700-5700/-, which have been revised from time to time on the basis of some parity sought by him with the case of Shri A.P. Sakalle.
S hri A.P. Sakalle, had filed O.A.No.1016/1999, which came to be decided on transfer to High Court, where it was registered as Writ Petition Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by ASHWANI PRAJAPATI Date: 2023.02.10 12:30:49 IST No.13697/2003 vide order dated 25.09.2006. Learned Single Judge had
dismissed the writ petition filed by Shri Sakalle and when this order was put to challenge before the Hon'ble Division Bench, then in W.A.No.1164/2006 passed on 05.09.2022, Hon'ble Division Bench of this High Court taking note of the law laid down by Supreme Court in M.P. Rural Agriculture Extension Officers Association Vs. State of M.P. and another [(2004) 4 SCC 646] , wherein, it is held that there can be two different pay scales from the same cadre and also taking into consideration the provisions contained in M.P. Technical Education (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1990, held that benefit of pay scale of Rs.3700-5700/- is to be extended either to Lecturer (Selection Grade) or the Head of the Department and the petitioner was neither a Lecturer
(Selection Grade) nor the Head of the Department and, therefore, no benefit could have been extended to him, upheld the orders of the writ Court.
T h u s , orders of the writ Court dated 25.09.2006 passed in W.P.No.13697/2003 and thereafter, decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench dated 05.09.2022 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the facts of the present case and, therefore, in the light of the said judgments, this petition also deserves to be dismissed and is, hereby, dismissed.
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE A.Praj.
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by ASHWANI PRAJAPATI Date: 2023.02.10 12:30:49 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!