Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14261 MP
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
MA No. 4836 of 2022
(SMT. SUNDERBAI AND OTHERS Vs SHRI GANGARAM AND OTHERS)
Dated : 03-11-2022
Shri Vasu Waswani, learned counsel for the appellants.
This Miscellaneous Appeal under Order XLIII Rule (1)(U) of the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed by the appellants/defendant Nos.1 to 5 being
aggrieved of judgment & decree dated 4.8.2022 passed by learned VII District
Judge, Bhopal in Regular Civil Appeal No.74/2022 remanding the matter after
setting aside the order of the Trial Court i.e. XIX Civil Judge Class-1, Bhopal
passed in Civil Suit No.646A/2017 on 5.10.2019.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the learned Civil
Judge had accepted the plea of suit being barred by principles of res judicata
and had allowed the application under VII Rule 11 of the C.P.C. The plaintiffs
filed an appeal in which the impugned order dated 5.10.2019 has been set aside
and the matter was remanded to the Trial Court. He also submits that the
learned 1st Appellate Court has placed reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble the
Supreme Court in Vaish Aggarwal Panchayat versus Inder Kumar &
Others AIR 2015 SC 3357 whereas it has overlooked a Larger Bench
Decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Suraj Ratan Irani & Others
versus Azamabad Tea Company Limited & Others AIR 1965 SC 295
whereby in Paragraph No.25, it is held that if the plaintiff whose suit was
dismissed in default then that dismissal merely creates a personal bar or
estoppel against the particular plaintiff suing on the same cause of action and
Signature Not Verified
SAN leaves the matter at large for those claiming under him. He further submits that
Digitally signed by AMIT JAIN
Date: 2022.11.03 19:10:30 IST the aforesaid proposition has not been accepted by learned Three Judges Bench
2
of Hon'ble the Supreme Court and, therefore, once it has come on record that
the suit in regard to the same piece of land was filed by the predecessor of the
defendant, namely, Parasram Ahirwar against the predecessor of the present set
of plaintiff(s) Dhundha and that suit was decreed vide order dated 27.2.1988
then it is no more open to the successor of Dhundha to agitate the same issue
as to the title and ownership of the land, which stood concluded in Regular
Civil Suit No.16A/1988 as was decided by learned IV Additional Civil Judge
Class-II, Bhopal vide judgment and decree dated 27.2.1988.
Issue notice to the respondents on payment of process fee by registered
A/D post within seven days. Notice be made returnable within four weeks.
Also heard in I.A.No.12158/2022 for stay. As an interim measure, it is directed and effect and operation of judgment and decree dated 4.8.2022 passed by learned VII District Judge, Bhopal in Regular Civil Appeal No.74/2022 shall remain stayed till next date of hearing.
List this case after service of notice to the respondents.
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE
amit
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by AMIT JAIN Date: 2022.11.03 19:10:30 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!